Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AlexK020908/infra-designer --skill dynamodb-tablegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AlexK020908/infra-designerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexk020908/infra-designer/dynamodb-table)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexk020908/infra-designer/dynamodb-table"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexk020908/infra-designer/dynamodb-table/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexk020908/infra-designer/dynamodb-table"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexk020908/infra-designer/dynamodb-table.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00802 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00401 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00160 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
dynamodb-table scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 31 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
aws.dynamodb.table
Fully-managed key-value store; single-digit-ms reads/writes at any scale. Config knobs here: billingMode, pointInTimeRecovery, streamEnabled. When to pick DynamoDB at all → data-modeling.md; key/index design rules → db-indexing.md.
Hard limits (apply regardless of billingMode — scaling capacity does NOT fix a hot key)
- Per partition: 3,000 RCU / 1,000 WCU = 12MB/s reads (3,000 × 4KB), 1MB/s writes (1,000 × 1KB), ~10GB data (partitions auto-split on size/throughput). A single hot partition key caps at these numbers; mitigation patterns → sharding.md.
- 400KB max item size (all attributes). Bigger payloads: store blob in S3, keep a pointer + metadata in the item.
- Writes round up to 1KB min (a 50-byte counter write still costs 1 WCU); reads round up to 4KB.
billingMode
PAY_PER_REQUEST(default, on-demand): per-request pricing, ~$1.12/M reads (4KB) and ~$5.62/M writes (1KB). Right for spiky/unpredictable or low traffic — no capacity planning.- Switch to
PROVISIONEDfor steady, predictable high traffic: ~$0.00065/WCU-hour, materially cheaper at sustained load (on-demand is "significantly higher" at scale — e.g. 10M writes/s ≈ $156K/day even provisioned). Rule of thumb: sustained utilization → provisioned + auto-scaling; otherwise keep the default.
Reads & consistency
- Consistency is per-request, not table config:
ConsistentRead=trueon GetItem/Query/Scan. Strong reads cost 2x (1 RCU/4KB vs 0.5) and only work on base table + LSIs — never on GSIs. - Avoid Scan; Query on keys only.
ProjectionExpressiontrims bandwidth but you still pay full RCU for item size — split large cold attributes into a separate table/item.
GSIs (mechanics only — when/how to design keys → db-indexing.md)
- A GSI is effectively a separate table: own partitions, own capacity (under provisioned mode, provision it separately), updated asynchronously → eventually consistent only, with replication lag.
- Write amplification: every base-table write fans out to each affected GSI. Max 20 GSIs; LSIs (max 5, same-partition, support strong reads, 10GB/partition-key cap) must be defined at table creation.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 31 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 32524991259f
dynamodb-table is a skill published in the GitHub repository AlexK020908/infra-designer (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 802 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
yida-data-management
A tool for querying, adding, and updating Yida form records, child tables, process records, and task-center data. It keeps ordinary forms and approval workflows on their separate data interfaces.
yida-aggregate-table
A workflow for managing Yida aggregate tables, also called virtual views. These are tables built from related form data rather than ordinary standalone records.
yida-db-seq-fix
A tool for checking and correcting PostgreSQL sequences, which generate automatic numeric IDs for new rows. It is designed for Yida databases after automatic table creation or data migration.
doris-repo-review
Review an Apache Doris PR from a local clone with the same multi-agent, shared-ledger convergence workflow as the CI Code Review Runner. Use when the user supplies a PR to /doris-repo-review, asks to review a Doris PR locally, or asks for the CI-style review flow. Safely align only the current worktree to the exact PR…
doris-best-practices
Apache Doris table design and cluster sizing best practices. MUST USE when writing, reviewing, or optimizing Doris CREATE TABLE statements, partition/bucket strategies, data models, or cluster configurations. ALSO MUST USE whenever the doris-architecture-advisor skill produces DDL — apply the Pre-Flight Checklist to…
doris-architecture-advisor
Workload-aware architecture design for Apache Doris. MUST USE when designing data architectures, choosing between data models, planning ingestion strategies, sizing clusters, or translating business requirements into Apache Doris system designs. Complements doris-best-practices with decision frameworks and…