Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alexvtejeda/elenchus --skill writing-plansgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexvtejeda/elenchusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexvtejeda/elenchus/writing-plans)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexvtejeda/elenchus/writing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexvtejeda/elenchus/writing-plans/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexvtejeda/elenchus/writing-plans"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexvtejeda/elenchus/writing-plans.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.01401 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00700 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00280 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00140 |
Grade A, and why
writing-plans scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 153 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 4fd4627d2c02
writing-plans is a skill published in the GitHub repository alexvtejeda/elenchus (2 stars, last pushed 24d ago), with no licence file. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 1,401 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
rubber-duck
Adversarial "rubber duck" review that turns explaining-out-loud into a hallucination check. The main session is the PRESENTER (it did the work — a design doc, investigation, or analysis — and holds the real reasoning) and reconstructs the topic to a LISTENER — a spawned subagent pinned to a DIFFERENT-vendor model that…
work-pipeline
Triggers the WORK-PIPELINE when a user request starts with a [] tag (e.g., [new-feature], [bugfix], [WORK start]). Use this skill whenever you detect a [] tag at the beginning of a user message.
feature-spec
Creates a complete product feature specification with acceptance criteria, scope, dependencies, and risks. Delegates to the Prometeo (PM) agent.
implement-feature
Implements a feature from its specification. Reads the spec, designs architecture, writes code and tests. Delegates to the Forja (Dev) agent.
review-findings
Addresses and fixes findings from a QA code review. Reads the review report, fixes critical and warning issues, and prepares for re-verification. Delegates to the Forja (Dev) agent.
security-audit
Deep security audit covering OWASP Top 10, authentication, authorization, data protection, dependency vulnerabilities, and secrets scanning. Delegates to the Centinela (QA) agent.