Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/alexzh3/codex-orchestrator/workflownpx skills add alexzh3/codex-orchestrator --skill workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexzh3/codex-orchestratorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexzh3/codex-orchestrator/workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexzh3/codex-orchestrator/workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexzh3/codex-orchestrator/workflow.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00882 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00441 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00176 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
codex-orchestrator-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Workflow
Use this skill for one complete run. This skill owns the lifecycle from planning through the final
report. Use ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/orchestrate/SKILL.md for each focused Codex-agent
execution, review, or verification cycle.
Run Initialization
From the target Git worktree, exclude run data locally before creating it:
REPO="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)"
cd "$REPO"
EXCLUDE_FILE="$(git rev-parse --git-path info/exclude)"
grep -qxF '/.codex-orchestrator/' "$EXCLUDE_FILE" ||
printf '\n/.codex-orchestrator/\n' >> "$EXCLUDE_FILE"
grep -qxF '/.codex-orchestrator/' "$EXCLUDE_FILE"
git check-ignore -q .codex-orchestrator/.ignore-check
git rev-parse HEAD
git branch --show-current
git status --short --untracked-files=all
Use only this local exclude; do not edit the tracked .gitignore. Record the concise original goal,
REPO, full starting HEAD, attached branch when the branch output is nonempty, and exact status
lines as goal, repo, repo_head, optional repo_branch, and repo_status in run_started.
Do not create the run unless both exclude checks succeed. Initially dirty paths are pre-existing
user work; if planned work overlaps them, use an isolated clean worktree or get user direction
rather than claiming those changes.
Full Workflow
- Inspect the repository and user context to understand the goal and relevant constraints.
- Perform Run Initialization, create
.codex-orchestrator/runs/<run-id>/journal.jsonl, and appendrun_startedwith the concise original goal, absolute repository path, captured Git baseline, plugin ref, and available Claude and Codex versions. - Claude turns the goal into a concrete plan with expected deliverables, acceptance criteria, risks, and verification paths.
- Ask Codex to review Claude's plan when a second opinion materially reduces risk; record that review as a task and focused agent cycle. For a consequential or hard-to-reverse design choice, first ask a fresh Codex agent to propose an approach from only the goal, constraints, and acceptance criteria. Claude compares the results using evidence rather than agent count and finalizes the plan.
- Split the finalized plan into active
taskentries with goals, acceptance criteria, and allowed/ownedfiles. Serialize overlapping work or use isolated worktrees. - For each task, use the orchestrate skill to assign or resume a Codex agent, capture its prompt, events, and handoff, and independently verify the result. Repeat focused fix or review cycles as needed.
- Record only consequential resolutions or user dependencies as
decision. Append a terminaltaskentry only after its acceptance criteria have been evaluated. - When every task is terminal, re-read the complete journal and inspect the final repository state and diff.
- Run the descriptive close check:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 76 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A c000946a61a8
codex-orchestrator-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository alexzh3/codex-orchestrator (83 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 882 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…