full-audit

full-audit is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from AlexZio00/sovereign-skills. It costs 205 tokens per session (4,955 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A procedure for an exhaustive review of a defined area, such as a codebase, documentation, configuration, or database. It combines deterministic checks, content review, counts, paths, versions, and cross-checking.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for full audits, such as checking all files, documentation, skills, memory, configuration, or database records against an agreed scope.
Why use it?
It makes broad coverage claims traceable and helps find missing, inconsistent, or outdated items across a whole area.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for Claude Code and Codex: user-invocable in frontmatter, but also agents/openai.yaml present. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions subagents.

Part of the full-audit plugin — 1 skill shipped together

Good fit Use it for full audits, such as checking all files, documentation, skills, memory, configuration, or database records against an agreed scope.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/alexzio00/sovereign-skills/full-audit
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add AlexZio00/sovereign-skills --skill full-audit
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AlexZio00/sovereign-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install full-audit, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for full-audit

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexzio00/sovereign-skills/full-audit/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexzio00/sovereign-skills/full-audit)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexzio00/sovereign-skills/full-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexzio00/sovereign-skills/full-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for full-audit

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexzio00/sovereign-skills/full-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexzio00/sovereign-skills/full-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 205 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,955 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00205 $0.04955
Opus 5 $0.00102 $0.02478
Sonnet 5 $0.00041 $0.00991
Haiku 4.5 $0.00020 $0.00496

Measured 4d ago against content hash 7594d1612f22, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

full-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

full-audit/SKILL.md · 175 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 175 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Full Audit — Exhaustive Area Review (v1.2)

Dominant Variable

Accuracy of the coverage claim — the word "exhaustive" ships with a method label or it doesn't ship at all. The moment an unreviewed area gets reported as reviewed, this skill has failed its own purpose.

Trigger

  • /full-audit [area] · "audit everything" · "exhaustive audit" · "full audit" · "double-check everything"
  • Default mode on any of the above: AUDIT_ONLY. These are analysis requests, not execution requests — see Execution Modes below. Advancing to PROPOSE or APPLY_APPROVED in the same invocation requires the user to say so explicitly (e.g. "audit everything and apply the fixes", "전수감사하고 바로 고쳐줘").

Discard If

  • Single file / single question needs checking → use a regular code review instead
  • The goal is a harness-maturity score against a fixed checklist → use a fixed-checklist scoring tool instead
  • The goal is a single docs-vs-code drift check → too narrow a scope for this
  • An identical-scope full audit finished within the last 7 days and nothing has changed → just diff against the existing coverage map instead

Key Assumptions

  1. Target area is agreed in Phase 0 — if not, don't start without an area table.
  2. Deterministic sweeping (scripts/grep) is available for the target — if not, skip Phase 1 and never claim "exhaustive" from Phase 2 (LLM review) alone.
  3. A prior coverage map can shrink the scope via diff — if not, do a full re-scan.

Execution Modes: AUDIT_ONLY / PROPOSE / APPLY_APPROVED

This skill keeps analysis and execution in separate, explicitly-named modes. A trigger phrase like "audit everything" or "분석해줘" selects a mode — it does not, by itself, authorize any file write.

Mode When active What runs Writable scope
AUDIT_ONLY (default) Any bare audit/analysis trigger, with no separate execution request Phase 0-3 (scope, deterministic sweep, content review, judgment) + Phase 5 (coverage map) None — read-only. No Edit/Write to any target file, protected or not.
PROPOSE User asks for fix proposals (after an AUDIT_ONLY pass, or up front) AUDIT_ONLY output + a listed fix/addition bucket (Phase 4 framing, nothing applied) None — still read-only, output is a proposal list
APPLY_APPROVED User explicitly approves specific items or the fix bucket as a whole ("이 항목들 적용해", "fix bucket 적용해") Applies only the items the user named as approved Limited to the approved items. A deny-listed path (rules/CLAUDE.md/settings — see Safety Layers) is reachable only here, only for that one named item, with its deny lifted for that single edit and restored immediately after — never as a routine step of "the edit procedure."

Read the full file on GitHub · 175 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago Changed · +20 lines · +44 tokens per session 7594d1612f22
  2. 12d ago First seen · 155 lines · 161 tokens per session scan A 14acb7b43c7d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

full-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository AlexZio00/sovereign-skills (129 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 205 tokens to every session and 4,955 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

doubt-driven-development

Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when you want every assumption cross-examined before proceeding, when stress-testing a plan for hidden failure modes, when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high…

addyosmani/agent-skills · 96 tokens

systemic-issue-triage

Trigger: new issue, bug report, triage, backlog, issue flood, community report, root cause, dead-end, blocked user. Attack issues by root class, never one-by-one; fixes must shrink the system, not grow it.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 57 tokens

issue-root-resolution

Trigger: root audit, atacar la raíz, issue roots, backlog roots, mechanism map, deletion-driven fix, resolver issues de raíz, close outdated issues. Audit and resolve issue clusters by verified root cause.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 45 tokens

rdd-defect-workflow

Trigger: RDD, receipt-driven development, review authority, receipt/lineage, correction/recovery, delivery gate/kill switch, bounded review defects. Guide work.

Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai · 41 tokens

incident-response

Incident management lifecycle — triage, communicate, mitigate, postmortem. Three modes — new (start incident), update (status update), postmortem (blameless RCA report).

drafthq/draft · 41 tokens

Sverklo Code Intelligence

Gives you deep codebase understanding — semantic search, blast-radius analysis, PR review, and health audits.

sverklo/sverklo · 27 tokens