vigilante-issue-implementation-on-dotnet

vigilante-issue-implementation-on-dotnet is a skill for Codex from aliengiraffe/vigilante. It costs 41 tokens per session (759 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A workflow for implementing GitHub issues in .NET and C# repositories from start to finish.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reading the issue and project guidance, changing code, running targeted tests and analyzers, formatting files, and checking dependency risks.
Why use it?
It keeps issue changes focused while following the repository's formatting, testing, analyzer, and security practices.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: agents/openai.yaml present. Also seen: mentions AGENTS.md; mentions Codex.

Good fit Reading the issue and project guidance, changing code, running targeted tests and analyzers, formatting files, and checking dependency risks.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/aliengiraffe/vigilante/vigilante-issue-implementation-on-dotnet
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add aliengiraffe/vigilante --skill vigilante-issue-implementation-on-dotnet
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aliengiraffe/vigilante

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for vigilante-issue-implementation-on-dotnet

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aliengiraffe/vigilante/vigilante-issue-implementation-on-dotnet/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/aliengiraffe/vigilante/vigilante-issue-implementation-on-dotnet)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aliengiraffe/vigilante/vigilante-issue-implementation-on-dotnet"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aliengiraffe/vigilante/vigilante-issue-implementation-on-dotnet/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for vigilante-issue-implementation-on-dotnet

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/aliengiraffe/vigilante/vigilante-issue-implementation-on-dotnet"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/aliengiraffe/vigilante/vigilante-issue-implementation-on-dotnet.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 41 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 759 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00041 $0.00759
Opus 5 $0.00020 $0.00380
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00152
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00076

Measured 11d ago against content hash 67f30633419e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

vigilante-issue-implementation-on-dotnet scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/vigilante-issue-implementation-on-dotnet/SKILL.md · 44 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 44 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Vigilante .NET Issue Implementation

Focus

  • Read the prompt for detected tech stacks, process hints, and .NET security guidance before changing code.
  • Follow the repository's existing .NET workflow, solution or project structure, analyzer configuration, and formatting conventions.
  • Keep changes scoped to the issue and do not broaden into unrelated cleanup or package churn.

.NET Tooling Workflow

  • Formatting: use the repository's established formatting path. When dotnet format is the standard SDK workflow, run it on the affected project or solution scope before committing.
  • Testing: run targeted dotnet test for the affected test project, project, or solution first, then broaden only when the change crosses project boundaries or the repository workflow requires it.
  • Analyzers: respect built-in .NET analyzers, nullable warnings, .editorconfig, Directory.Build.props, and repo-defined warning severities. Do not weaken analyzer settings without a narrow, documented reason.
  • Package auditing: when dependency changes are involved or package risk is relevant, use the repository's standard NuGet restore or audit flow and review advisories when auditing is enabled.
  • Dependencies: prefer framework or standard-library features when they cover the need. Avoid unrelated package version churn.

.NET Coding Style

  • Follow existing project patterns for namespaces, file layout, and test structure.
  • Preserve nullable reference type correctness and prefer explicit null handling over suppression.
  • Prefer straightforward error handling and clear APIs over reflection-heavy or overly abstracted changes unless the issue requires it.
  • Keep public API changes minimal and aligned with the issue.

Security

  • Do not commit secrets, tokens, certificates, or environment-specific credentials.
  • Prefer configuration binding, options patterns, environment variables, or local user-secrets workflows over hard-coded settings.
  • In ASP.NET Core code, preserve secure defaults for authentication, authorization, antiforgery or CSRF protections where applicable, HTTPS, and sensitive-data handling.
  • Respect security analyzers and dependency advisories when the repository enables them.

Read the full file on GitHub · 44 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 44 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 67f30633419e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

vigilante-issue-implementation-on-dotnet is a skill published in the GitHub repository aliengiraffe/vigilante (40 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 759 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.