Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alinaqi/maggy --skill android-kotlingit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alinaqi/maggyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alinaqi/maggy/android-kotlin)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alinaqi/maggy/android-kotlin"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alinaqi/maggy/android-kotlin/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alinaqi/maggy/android-kotlin"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alinaqi/maggy/android-kotlin.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Socket pass
- Snyk warn
- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.02993 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.01496 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00599 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00299 |
Grade A, and why
android-kotlin scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 459 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Android Kotlin Skill
Project Structure
project/
├── app/
│ ├── src/
│ │ ├── main/
│ │ │ ├── kotlin/com/example/app/
│ │ │ │ ├── data/ # Data layer
│ │ │ │ │ ├── local/ # Room database
│ │ │ │ │ ├── remote/ # Retrofit/Ktor services
│ │ │ │ │ └── repository/ # Repository implementations
│ │ │ │ ├── di/ # Hilt modules
│ │ │ │ ├── domain/ # Business logic
│ │ │ │ │ ├── model/ # Domain models
│ │ │ │ │ ├── repository/ # Repository interfaces
│ │ │ │ │ └── usecase/ # Use cases
│ │ │ │ ├── ui/ # Presentation layer
│ │ │ │ │ ├── feature/ # Feature screens
│ │ │ │ │ │ ├── FeatureScreen.kt # Compose UI
│ │ │ │ │ │ └── FeatureViewModel.kt
│ │ │ │ │ ├── components/ # Reusable Compose components
│ │ │ │ │ └── theme/ # Material theme
│ │ │ │ └── App.kt # Application class
│ │ │ ├── res/
│ │ │ └── AndroidManifest.xml
│ │ ├── test/ # Unit tests
│ │ └── androidTest/ # Instrumentation tests
│ └── build.gradle.kts
├── build.gradle.kts # Project-level build file
├── gradle.properties
├── settings.gradle.kts
└── CLAUDE.md
Gradle Configuration (Kotlin DSL)
App-level build.gradle.kts
plugins {
id("com.android.application")
id("org.jetbrains.kotlin.android")
id("com.google.dagger.hilt.android")
id("com.google.devtools.ksp")
}
android {
namespace = "com.example.app"
compileSdk = 34
defaultConfig {
applicationId = "com.example.app"
minSdk = 24
targetSdk = 34
versionCode = 1
versionName = "1.0"
testInstrumentationRunner = "androidx.test.runner.AndroidJUnitRunner"
}
buildTypes {
release {
isMinifyEnabled = true
proguardFiles(
getDefaultProguardFile("proguard-android-optimize.txt"),
"proguard-rules.pro"
)
}
}
compileOptions {
sourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_17
targetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_17
}
kotlinOptions {
jvmTarget = "17"
}
buildFeatures {
compose = true
}
composeOptions {
kotlinCompilerExtensionVersion = "1.5.8"
}
}
dependencies {
// Compose BOM
val composeBom = platform("androidx.compose:compose-bom:2024.01.00")
implementation(composeBom)
implementation("androidx.compose.ui:ui")
implementation("androidx.compose.ui:ui-tooling-preview")
implementation("androidx.compose.material3:material3")
implementation("androidx.activity:activity-compose:1.8.2")
implementation("androidx.lifecycle:lifecycle-viewmodel-compose:2.7.0")
// Coroutines
implementation("org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-android:1.7.3")
// Hilt
implementation("com.google.dagger:hilt-android:2.50")
ksp("com.google.dagger:hilt-compiler:2.50")
implementation("androidx.hilt:hilt-navigation-compose:1.1.0")
// Room
implementation("androidx.room:room-runtime:2.6.1")
implementation("androidx.room:room-ktx:2.6.1")
ksp("androidx.room:room-compiler:2.6.1")
// Testing
testImplementation("junit:junit:4.13.2")
testImplementation("io.mockk:mockk:1.13.9")
testImplementation("org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-test:1.7.3")
testImplementation("app.cash.turbine:turbine:1.0.0")
androidTestImplementation("androidx.test.ext:junit:1.1.5")
androidTestImplementation("androidx.compose.ui:ui-test-junit4")
debugImplementation("androidx.compose.ui:ui-tooling")
debugImplementation("androidx.compose.ui:ui-test-manifest")
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 459 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 45e723afefe0
android-kotlin is a skill published in the GitHub repository alinaqi/maggy (706 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 2,993 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
typescript-sdk
Implement or modify TypeScript SDK behavior in @composio/core or shared TypeScript packages, including tools, toolkits, sessions, auth configs, connected accounts, modifiers, and generated SDK surfaces. Use for TS runtime/API work; pair with typescript-testing for verification and cross-sdk-parity when Python must…
typescript-testing
Select and run TypeScript SDK verification for packages, examples, type checks, linting, builds, Vitest suites, and runtime E2E tests. Use when adding tests, diagnosing TypeScript CI, choosing a focused test command, or validating TypeScript package changes. Do not use for Python-only checks.
python-providers
Create, modify, test, or package Python provider adapters under python/providers, including framework-specific dependencies, public imports, type inference, and provider metadata. Use for Python provider work only; use python-sdk for core SDK changes.
python-testing
Select and run Python SDK verification with nox, Makefile targets, Ruff, mypy, pytest markers, sanity tests, type inference checks, and build checks. Use when adding Python tests, diagnosing Python CI, or validating Python SDK/provider changes. Do not use for TypeScript-only checks.
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
verify
Runs this project's check chain through scripts/verify.py and reads the receipt it writes. Fires when tracked changes are finished, when the user asks whether work passes, before a commit, and before reporting a task done. Stays dormant in repositories with no detectable check chain, during read-only audits, and for…