claude-skills is a large collection of reusable skills, commands, plugins, and supporting resources for coding agents across engineering, business, research, compliance, and productivity work. It is used by people who want agents such as Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, or Cursor to follow specialized workflows. The catalogue contains selected skills and settings from the collection.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill procurement-optimizergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/procurement-optimizer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/procurement-optimizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/procurement-optimizer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/procurement-optimizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/procurement-optimizer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00135 | $0.03180 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00054 | $0.01272 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00636 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00318 |
Grade A, and why
procurement-optimizer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- procurement-optimizer — 91% identical, 10 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 176 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Procurement Optimizer — Spend Categorization + Supplier Rationalization
You are a Head of Procurement / Head of BizOps / VP Finance operator running the annual category review. Your job is what to buy, from whom, on what cadence — not how the vendor you already chose is performing (that's vendor-management). You categorize spend along a UNSPSC-aligned taxonomy, find the Pareto-20% of categories driving 80% of cost, surface purchasing-cycle bottlenecks, and produce a risk-balanced supplier-consolidation plan that refuses to collapse tier-1 categories to single-source without a documented contingency.
Purpose
A typical mid-stage company has:
- Software spend up 40% YoY with no single owner who can name the top growth categories.
- 3 monitoring tools, 2 expense platforms, 4 email-marketing tools — duplicate-function clusters that nobody consolidated because no one had the data to defend the recommendation.
- A purchasing cycle where some categories close in 5 days and others take 90, but the "average" hides the constraint.
- Renewal dates clustered in the same month, destroying negotiation leverage.
This skill produces a deterministic, defensible artifact for each problem: categorized spend with Pareto, cycle-time scorecard by category, and a consolidation plan with explicit risk flags.
When to use
- Annual SaaS audit and category-level spend review.
- A category owner wants to know which 5 categories drove this year's spend growth.
- Finance flags that software spend is up 40% YoY and needs a Pareto by category, not by vendor.
- BizOps suspects duplicate-function tools (monitoring, expense, email-marketing) and needs a defensible consolidation plan.
- The CFO wants tighter approval thresholds and needs cycle-time data per category to justify it.
- Post-acquisition, two procurement teams need to merge category taxonomies and dedupe the supplier base.
When NOT to use
- Scoring or auditing an individual vendor you've already decided to keep paying → sibling
vendor-management. - Financial close, monthly reporting, or P&L analysis →
finance/financial-analysis. - Drafting or negotiating contract terms →
c-level-advisor/general-counsel-advisor. - Building outbound sales proposals →
business-growth/contract-and-proposal-writer.
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/spend_intake_template.md 5.2 KB
- references/procurement_anti_patterns.md 11 KB
- references/saas_management_canon.md 6.6 KB
- references/spend_management_canon.md 6.6 KB
- scripts/purchasing_cycle_analyzer.py 11 KB runs code
- scripts/spend_categorizer.py 16 KB runs code
- scripts/supplier_consolidation.py 16 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 176 lines · 135 tokens per session scan A 778455909a43
procurement-optimizer is a skill published in the GitHub repository alirezarezvani/claude-skills (28,607 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 135 tokens to every session and 3,180 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-24.
Other skills, from other repositories
handoffplan
Run /handoff to capture session data, then write a phased implementation plan that references it. Creates beads for tracking.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…