Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add All-The-Vibes/ATV-PaperBoard --skill regenerate-artifactgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/All-The-Vibes/ATV-PaperBoardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/all-the-vibes/atv-paperboard/regenerate-artifact)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/all-the-vibes/atv-paperboard/regenerate-artifact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/all-the-vibes/atv-paperboard/regenerate-artifact/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/all-the-vibes/atv-paperboard/regenerate-artifact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/all-the-vibes/atv-paperboard/regenerate-artifact.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00259 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00130 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00052 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
regenerate-artifact scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
regenerate-artifact
Recovers a failing artifact via three progressively conservative retry steps.
Usage
paperboard regenerate <slug>
When to invoke
validate-artifactreturns FAIL and theartifact-reviewerrecommendsREGENERATE_VIA regenerate-artifact.- Never invoke without a prior validation failure — check first.
Retry strategy
| Step | Change | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Switch tier (cycle among atv / pico / daisy; atv is default) | Different tier/CSS framework may avoid inline color conflicts |
| 2 | Drop optional components from input | Reduces surface area for color violations |
| 3 | Fall back to paperboard.DESIGN.md |
Known-good default design always lints clean |
Output
Prints: Regenerate step=<N> new_slug=<slug> status=ACCEPT|FAIL(<fail_class>)
Exit 0 on ACCEPT, exit 1 if all three steps fail.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 36 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 532005543fb0
regenerate-artifact is a skill published in the GitHub repository All-The-Vibes/ATV-PaperBoard (1 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 259 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
codebase-discovery
Extract domain, architecture, business rules, workflows and a business glossary from an existing (often poorly documented) codebase, then validate the findings with a senior BA/Product Owner one question at a time. Produces onboarding-grade docs under docs/ that give a new team member — human or AI — enough context to…
knowledge-curation
Process a source document (functional spec, technical doc, ADR, meeting notes, interview, workshop, glossary) into curated knowledge under /knowledge. Use when asked to curate, extract, decompose, or structure a business document, or when curation is mentioned alongside a file path or attachment or a non-document…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
rulesync
Generates and syncs AI rule configuration files (.cursorrules, CLAUDE.md, copilot-instructions.md) across 20+ coding tools from a single source. Use when syncing AI rules, running rulesync commands, importing or generating rule files, or managing shared AI coding configurations.
establishing-project-context
Use when the user asks to establish shared project language, or project work exposes a conflicting, renamed, or deprecated domain term that needs active semantic modeling. Routine small tasks stay on the fast path.
gitnexus
A code-graph analysis add-on for examining an existing codebase, including symbols, call paths, execution flows, and effects across repositories. It can query GitNexus through its command-line or MCP interfaces.