Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add All-The-Vibes/ATV-Phoenix --skill phoenix-missiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/All-The-Vibes/ATV-PhoenixWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/all-the-vibes/atv-phoenix/phoenix-mission)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/all-the-vibes/atv-phoenix/phoenix-mission"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/all-the-vibes/atv-phoenix/phoenix-mission/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/all-the-vibes/atv-phoenix/phoenix-mission"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/all-the-vibes/atv-phoenix/phoenix-mission.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00153 | $0.02241 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00061 | $0.00896 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00448 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00224 |
Grade A, and why
phoenix-mission scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 174 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
phoenix-mission — supervised DAG execution
phoenix-goal drives one goal. phoenix-intent decomposes an intent into N goals and proves the
composite. Neither one schedules: they run loops back to back and trust that nothing collides.
phoenix-mission is the scheduler. It takes goals with declared prerequisites and runs them under
the supervisor spine:
plan → admit under capacity → isolate → execute → ledger + chain → contain failure
Read this first: what capacity means
capacity is a real parallelism limit. Goals admitted together execute concurrently — one
thread per goal — and the supervisor never admits more than capacity at once. Four independent
goals at capacity: 4 run at the same time; at capacity: 1 they run one after another.
Only the goal's own work runs off the scheduler thread. Admission, leases, worktrees, budgets, the run ledger, and the hash-chained traces are all settled on the scheduler thread between batches — the chains are hash-linked, so concurrent appends would corrupt the record used to prove what happened.
With backend: "cloud", each goal is submitted and polled on its own thread, so cloud goals
genuinely overlap too.
What you get:
| Property | What it means |
|---|---|
| True concurrency | Up to capacity goals inside execute simultaneously |
| Dependency ordering | A goal runs only after every prerequisite succeeded |
| Contained failure | A failed goal blocks its dependents; unrelated branches still complete |
| Panic containment | A backend that panics fails its own goal; the mission still settles |
| Worktree isolation | Every executed goal gets an exclusive workspace path |
| Lease fencing | A stale holder cannot write over a goal it no longer owns |
| Budgets | Per-goal and mission-wide caps; the mission stops when the mission cap blows |
| Durable run ledger | One append-only entry per execution, with backend + cost + error |
| Per-goal trace chains | Each goal gets its own tamper-evident chain, verified independently |
| Cloud dispatch | Each goal can run on a GitHub Copilot cloud agent instead of this machine |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 174 lines · 153 tokens per session scan A 8192cda8e49b
phoenix-mission is a skill published in the GitHub repository All-The-Vibes/ATV-Phoenix (6 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 153 tokens to every session and 2,241 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
cva-analysis
Systematic abstraction discovery using Commonality Variability Analysis. Build matrix of what varies vs what's constant, then let patterns emerge. Prevents wrong abstractions by deferring pattern selection until requirements are analyzed. Use when facing multiple similar requirements and need to discover natural…
programming-advisor
Evaluate existing solutions (libraries, SaaS, open source) AND internal prior-art before custom development to avoid reinventing the wheel. Use when considering building new features, asking "should I build or use existing", "do we already have this", "is there existing code for X in this repo", "is there a library…
world-model-diagnostic
Twenty-minute diagnostic mapping a team to a world-model paradigm (vector DB, structured ontology, signal-fidelity). Use when you say "run the world model diagnostic", "audit our world model", "which world model architecture fits us", or "audit where we automate judgment". Use for AI readiness assessments and…
ai-agents-portability-campaign
Execute cross-harness hook changes for Claude Code and GitHub Copilot CLI using the settled official contract, versioned probes, generators, and runtime tests. Use for run the portability campaign, port hooks to a new harness, copilot hook timeout regression, or new copilot cli release, recheck the contract. Do NOT…
pre-mortem
Guide prospective hindsight analysis to identify project risks before failure occurs. Teams imagine the project has failed spectacularly, then work backward to identify causes. Increases risk identification by 30% compared to traditional planning. Use when you say "run a pre-mortem on", "what could cause this to…
maintainer-review
Make a need-gated maintainer decision (merge, request changes, supersede, close) on one PR or issue and draft a comment, with no remote action. Use for maintainer decision on this PR. Do NOT use as the quality gate (use review) or to answer your own PR threads (use pr-comment-responder).