Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AllanWessels/Bratan --skill parallel-fanout-verificationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AllanWessels/BratanWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/allanwessels/bratan/parallel-fanout-verification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/allanwessels/bratan/parallel-fanout-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/allanwessels/bratan/parallel-fanout-verification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/allanwessels/bratan/parallel-fanout-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/allanwessels/bratan/parallel-fanout-verification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00881 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00352 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00176 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
parallel-fanout-verification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 92 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A f38ba05ae07d
parallel-fanout-verification is a skill published in the GitHub repository AllanWessels/Bratan (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 881 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
evidence-audit
Evidence-led audit/fix rounds for any codebase in any language. Finds only defects that a runnable proof reproduces on current code, applies the narrowest in-scope patch, verifies with a second proof, promotes high-risk proofs to permanent regression tests, and reports exact validation results. Use whenever the user…
debugging
Use this skill when something is broken and the cause is unknown — a failing test, a crash, an error message, wrong output, a regression, a hang, or behaviour that differs between environments — and it has to be found and fixed at the root. Also use it to build the failing proof for a suspected defect before fixing…
testing
Use this skill when writing, fixing, reviewing, or planning tests in any project, in whatever runner the project already uses. Also use it to write the failing proof for a suspected bug and to promote that proof into a durable regression test. Triggers: user says "test", "unit test", "integration test", "e2e", "mock"…
verify-before-done
Use this skill before telling the user a code change is finished, fixed, or working — to prove it with the project's own checks and report exactly what was and wasn't verified. Triggers: finishing an implementation or fix, writing the final summary of code changes, "done", "is it working", "did you test it", "make…
visual-regression
Detect unintended UI changes with reproducible rendered screenshots and reviewed baselines. Use when adding screenshot checks or investigating layout/theme regressions; do not approve a changed image merely to make the test green.
design-qa-checklist
Build a QA checklist for verifying that a build matches the design. Use at implementation review. For the spec engineers build from, use handoff-spec.