Logging Failures

Logging Failures is a skill for Claude Code from allsmog/vuln-scout. It costs 54 tokens per session (2,949 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide to reviewing application logs and security alerts for unsafe or missing information. It covers fake log entries, secrets in logs, incomplete audit records, and log tampering risks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect logging code for log injection, leaked credentials or personal data, missing security events, and incomplete audit trails.
Why use it?
Poor logging can hide attacks, let users alter what investigators see, or expose sensitive data. This guide helps check whether important security events are recorded safely and sufficiently.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the vuln-scout plugin — 32 skills, 15 commands, 9 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to inspect logging code for log injection, leaked credentials or personal data, missing security events, and incomplete audit trails.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/allsmog/vuln-scout/logging-failures
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add allsmog/vuln-scout --skill logging-failures
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/allsmog/vuln-scout

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install vuln-scout, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 32 skills, 15 commands, 9 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for Logging Failures

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/allsmog/vuln-scout/logging-failures/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/allsmog/vuln-scout/logging-failures)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/allsmog/vuln-scout/logging-failures"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/allsmog/vuln-scout/logging-failures/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for Logging Failures

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/allsmog/vuln-scout/logging-failures"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/allsmog/vuln-scout/logging-failures.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 54 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,949 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00054 $0.02949
Opus 5 $0.00027 $0.01474
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00590
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00295

Measured 9d ago against content hash 1f369568a9e8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

Logging Failures scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

vuln-scout/skills/logging-failures/SKILL.md · 408 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 408 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Logging & Alerting Failures (OWASP A09)

Purpose

Provide detection patterns for logging vulnerabilities including log injection, insufficient logging of security events, secrets in logs, and log tampering vulnerabilities.

OWASP Top 10 Mapping

Category: A09 - Security Logging & Alerting Failures

CWEs:

  • CWE-117: Improper Output Neutralization for Logs
  • CWE-223: Omission of Security-Relevant Information
  • CWE-532: Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File
  • CWE-778: Insufficient Logging

When to Use

Activate this skill when:

  • Reviewing logging implementations
  • Checking for log injection vulnerabilities
  • Auditing security event logging
  • Looking for secrets exposed in logs
  • Verifying audit trail completeness

Log Injection (CWE-117)

Overview

Log injection occurs when user-controlled input is written to logs without sanitization, allowing attackers to inject fake log entries or manipulate log output.

Detection Patterns

Python
# String concatenation in logs
grep -rniE "logging\.(info|debug|error|warn).*\+|logger\.(info|debug|error|warn).*\+" --include="*.py"

# f-string/format in logs with user input
grep -rniE "logging\.(info|debug|error|warn).*f['\"]|logger\..*\.format\(" --include="*.py"

Vulnerable:

# VULNERABLE: User input directly in log
logger.info(f"User login: {request.form['username']}")  # Can inject newlines

Secure:

# SAFE: Structured logging
logger.info("User login", extra={"username": sanitize(username)})
Java
# String concatenation in logs
grep -rniE "log\.(info|debug|error|warn).*\+|logger\.(info|debug|error|warn).*\+" --include="*.java"

# Format with user input
grep -rniE "String\.format.*log|log.*String\.format" --include="*.java"

Vulnerable:

// VULNERABLE: Direct concatenation
logger.info("User login: " + username);  // Can inject newlines

Secure:

// SAFE: Parameterized logging
logger.info("User login: {}", sanitize(username));

Read the full file on GitHub · 408 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 408 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 1f369568a9e8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

Logging Failures is a skill published in the GitHub repository allsmog/vuln-scout (24 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 2,949 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

sast-config

Reviews and tunes SAST tool configurations against OWASP ASVS 4.0.3 and CWE Top 25. Auto-invoked when reviewing Semgrep rules, CodeQL queries, SAST CI integration, or false positive triage workflows. Produces a SAST maturity assessment covering rule authoring, severity tuning, custom rule development, and CI…

UnitOneAI/SecuritySkills · 78 tokens

sast-semgrep

Static application security testing (SAST) using Semgrep for vulnerability detection, security code review, and secure coding guidance with OWASP and CWE framework mapping. Use when: (1) Scanning code for security vulnerabilities across multiple languages, (2) Performing security code reviews with pattern-based…

AgentSecOps/SecOpsAgentKit · 116 tokens

sast-semgrep

Static application security testing (SAST) using Semgrep for vulnerability detection, security code review, and secure coding guidance with OWASP and CWE framework mapping. Use when: (1) Scanning code for security vulnerabilities across multiple languages, (2) Performing security code reviews with pattern-based…

rohunj/claude-build-workflow · 116 tokens

implementing-devsecops-security-scanning

Integrates Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), and Software Composition Analysis (SCA) into CI/CD pipelines using open-source tools. Covers Semgrep for SAST, Trivy for SCA and container scanning, OWASP ZAP for DAST, and Gitleaks for secrets detection. Activates for…

xalgorix/xalgorix · 109 tokens

integrating-sast-into-github-actions-pipeline

This skill covers integrating Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tools—CodeQL and Semgrep—into GitHub Actions CI/CD pipelines. It addresses configuring automated code scanning on pull requests and pushes, tuning rules to reduce false positives, uploading SARIF results to GitHub Advanced Security, and…

xalgorix/xalgorix · 84 tokens

implementing-semgrep-for-custom-sast-rules

Write custom Semgrep SAST rules in YAML to detect application-specific vulnerabilities, enforce coding standards, and integrate into CI/CD pipelines.

xalgorix/xalgorix · 37 tokens