Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add almasumdev/awesome-flutter-agent-skills --skill flutter-integration-testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/almasumdev/awesome-flutter-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/almasumdev/awesome-flutter-agent-skills/flutter-integration-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/almasumdev/awesome-flutter-agent-skills/flutter-integration-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/almasumdev/awesome-flutter-agent-skills/flutter-integration-test.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00842 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00421 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00168 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
flutter-integration-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 103 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A b00d2563f8c4
flutter-integration-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository almasumdev/awesome-flutter-agent-skills (1 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 842 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
compose-ui-testing
Expert guidance on Jetpack Compose UI testing with createAndroidComposeRule, semantics matchers, synchronization, and screenshot tests with Paparazzi or Roborazzi. Use this for instrumented and screenshot UI tests.
espresso-java
Expert guidance on Android UI testing in Java with Espresso, IdlingResource, Hilt test rules, and Robolectric for fast JVM UI tests. Use this when writing instrumented tests, replacing flaky sleeps, or setting up a hermetic UI test harness.
ios-ui-testing
Expert guidance on XCUITest — accessibility identifiers, robust element queries, screenshot flows, test plans, and CI stability. Use when writing end-to-end UI tests.
mobile-qa-process
Release checklists, regression suites, exploratory bug bashes, and how to run QA for a mobile app without burning the team out. Use when preparing a release or standing up a QA practice.
mobile-testing-strategy
Mobile testing strategy - pyramid, device selection, flake reduction, device clouds, and test-category scope. Use when setting up or auditing the testing approach of a mobile project.
device-farms
Expert guidance on running mobile tests on Firebase Test Lab, AWS Device Farm, BrowserStack App Automate, and Sauce Labs. Use when asked to set up device-farm coverage, design a device matrix, or compare vendors.