Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add almasumdev/awesome-mobile-observability-agent-skills --skill analytics-privacygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/almasumdev/awesome-mobile-observability-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/almasumdev/awesome-mobile-observability-agent-skills/analytics-privacy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/almasumdev/awesome-mobile-observability-agent-skills/analytics-privacy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/almasumdev/awesome-mobile-observability-agent-skills/analytics-privacy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/almasumdev/awesome-mobile-observability-agent-skills/analytics-privacy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/almasumdev/awesome-mobile-observability-agent-skills/analytics-privacy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.01493 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00746 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00299 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00149 |
Grade A, and why
analytics-privacy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 150 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 2c8ffbd1081f
analytics-privacy is a skill published in the GitHub repository almasumdev/awesome-mobile-observability-agent-skills (1 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,493 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other skills, from other repositories
general-counsel-reviewer
Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a General Counsel archetype, then saves a structured review document with a verdict, findings that cite the artifact, legal risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a legal review, a general counsel pressure-test of a document…
procurement-reviewer
Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or vendor contract in character as a Head of Procurement archetype, then saves a structured review document with a verdict, findings that cite the artifact, commercial risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a procurement review, a commercial or…
contract-review-pack
Abstracts one contract into a key-terms table, compares each term against the user's own playbook of standard positions, and produces a DRAFT contract review pack with a deviations and issues list, open questions and a reviewer checklist. Flags governing law and never gives legal advice, interpretation, or…
dpia-draft-pack
Reads a project or processing description and produces a DRAFT DPIA pack — processing description, necessity and proportionality questions, a risk table with rating cells left blank, mitigations to consider, and open questions. Never rates risk, determines the lawful basis, or judges adequacy; the DPO assesses and…
controls-gap-pack
Reads a requirement, regulation, or policy and the organisation's control descriptions, then produces a DRAFT controls-and-gap pack — the requirement broken into obligations, mapped controls, apparent coverage, gaps, and actions to assess. Never concludes compliance or that a control is effective; control owners and…
export-review-pack
Reads a transaction or order description and produces a DRAFT export review pack — a parties-to-screen list and checklist, a classification worksheet, a red-flag review, and licence-determination questions — to prepare an export-control review. Never classifies, screens, clears, or decides a licence; trade compliance…