Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to alonf/MCPPythonDemo. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/alonf/MCPPythonDemo/master/.squad/skills/branch-archaeology/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alonf/MCPPythonDemoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alonf/mcppythondemo/branch-archaeology)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alonf/mcppythondemo/branch-archaeology"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alonf/mcppythondemo/branch-archaeology/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alonf/mcppythondemo/branch-archaeology"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alonf/mcppythondemo/branch-archaeology.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00433 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00173 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00087 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
branch-archaeology scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Context
Use this when a repository has milestone-named branches but branch names or tip commits are not trustworthy indicators of the actual teaching progression.
Patterns
- Start with the roadmap or lecture artifact (
docs/MCPDemoRoadmap.mdhere) to learn the intended milestones. - Verify each milestone by diffing the branch against the previous milestone and by reading the exact server/client files touched.
- Check branch containment (
git branch --contains <sha>) before assuming milestones are linear ancestors. - Prefer behavior over labels: summarize what tools, resources, prompts, transports, and safety mechanisms actually changed.
- Note documentation drift explicitly when README text lags behind the code.
Examples
- In
alonf/MCPDemo,milestone-1throughmilestone-7are best interpreted via roadmap plus file diffs; onlymilestone-7flows directly intomaster. masterdiffers frommilestone-7mostly by docs polish (docs/Milestone-*.gif) and minor solution metadata, so the runtime architecture is effectively the milestone-7 architecture.
Anti-Patterns
- Assuming milestone branches form a strict ancestry chain without checking.
- Using only branch tip commit messages to infer milestone content.
- Treating README prose as authoritative when branch code and roadmap disagree.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 37 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 6d0230358549
branch-archaeology is a skill published in the GitHub repository alonf/MCPPythonDemo (0 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 433 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
branch-archaeology compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| branch-archaeologyalonf/MCPPythonDemo | Skill | 0 | 6mo ago | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code, Codex |
| newcomer-issue-explainerapache/magpie | Skill | 138 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 100 | Claude Code |
| github-contributorseaworld008/Commonly-used-high-value-skills | Skill | 74 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 25 | Claude Code, Codex |
| stage-and-commitclassroomio/classroomio | Skill | 1.7k | yesterday | AGPL-3.0 | A | 38 | Claude Code, Codex |
| textbook-initcabbage2000-lab/textbook-writer-skills | Skill | 44 | 19d ago | MIT | A | 155 | Claude Code |
| releaseAndamio-Platform/coach | Skill | 6 | 6d ago | MIT | A | 24 | Claude Code |
| project-quizRuisi-Lu/github-loop-engineering-skill | Skill | 8 | yesterday | MIT | A | 71 | Claude Code |