Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add alphabravo-oss/guild/plugin install websterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alphabravo-oss/guild/pedagogy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alphabravo-oss/guild/pedagogy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alphabravo-oss/guild/pedagogy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alphabravo-oss/guild/pedagogy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alphabravo-oss/guild/pedagogy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01369 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00548 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00274 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00137 |
Grade A, and why
pedagogy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 120 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pedagogy
The best writing instructions in this plugin were vendored with the tutorial agent, and then
fenced off where almost nothing could reach them. In the last full run, 3 pages of 67 were
doc_type: tutorial. The other 64 got none of it.
That was the wrong boundary. Teaching is not a genre of page. It is what any page owes a reader who has not used the product before, and that reader is on the how-to and the troubleshooting page too.
So these rules apply to every page whose audience is user, whatever its doc_type, and to
operator pages wherever the operator is new to the product rather than new to terminals.
The four that matter
1. Say what the reader will end up with, first
Not what the page covers. What they will have when they close it.
- Weak: "This page covers the deployment wizard."
- Real: "By the end of this you will have one cluster running, and you will know which screen tells you it is ready."
For a tutorial doctype.py checks the literal "By the end of this tutorial you will be able to"
because Good Docs is emphatic about it. On other types the wording is free and the obligation is
not: the first paragraph tells the reader whether this page is for them.
2. Everything they need, before step one
A reader who reaches step 4 and finds they needed credentials has been failed, and they have been failed in a specific way: they now distrust the rest of the page.
State the lot up front: access, accounts, a thing installed, a decision already made. If nothing is needed, say that too. "You do not need an account for this" is a real sentence that saves a real reader a real detour.
3. A concept is introduced before it is used
The single most common way documentation assumes knowledge of the product it is documenting. A term appears on page one as though the reader has already met it, because the writer met it in the source an hour earlier.
- Expand an acronym the first time. Once.
doctype.pychecks this part. - Introduce a product word the first time it carries weight, in one clause, not a paragraph.
- A term needing more than a clause belongs in the glossary, and the page links it.
- A whole concept needing to be settled before the task makes sense belongs on an explanation page, and the task page links that rather than teaching it inline.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 120 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A acb5eecf0280
pedagogy is a skill published in the GitHub repository alphabravo-oss/guild (2 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,369 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
hr-onboarding
A new-hire onboarding plan as a single page — first week schedule, buddy + manager intro, learning track, equipment checklist, and "you're set when…" outcomes. Use when the brief mentions "onboarding", "new hire", "first week plan", or "入职".
book-mirror
Take any book (EPUB/PDF), produce a personalized chapter-by-chapter analysis. Each chapter is preserved in detail (The Chapter) and mirrored back to the reader's actual life (The Mirror) using brain context. The mirror observes and resonates — a friend pointing out parallels, NOT a consultant rearranging the reader's…
lean-formalize
Develop and verify a mathematical proof in Lean, continue an incomplete Lean project, or audit whether it proves the original statement. Connect actual inputs to intermediate lemmas, assemble the target theorem, check its transitive axioms, and provide a reproducible handoff. Use when Lean is requested or a specific…
exam-forecast
Analyze past exams from the same professor to surface patterns — subject weighting, recurring issue-spot traps, favored hypo types, policy-vs-doctrine mix — and forecast likely emphases for the upcoming exam. Use when the user says "what's on the exam", "analyze past exams", "predict the exam", or shares past exams.
eli5
Explain research, papers, or technical ideas in plain English with minimal jargon, concrete analogies, and clear takeaways. Use when the user says "ELI5 this", asks for a simple explanation of a paper or research result, wants jargon removed, or asks what something technically dense actually means.
deck-course-module
A course or workshop slide template with persistent learning goals, teaching pages, multiple-choice self-tests, and a wrap-up.