Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ALTEN-group/coding-pal --skill release-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ALTEN-group/coding-palWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alten-group/coding-pal/release-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alten-group/coding-pal/release-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alten-group/coding-pal/release-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alten-group/coding-pal/release-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alten-group/coding-pal/release-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00093 | $0.00803 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00037 | $0.00321 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00161 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
release-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 53 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Release Plan
Produce deterministic release.md declarations that DevOps can approve quickly and the rollout pipeline can execute without judgement calls. AI drafts and proposes thresholds; DevOps decides. Promotion and rollback are computed by a script against thresholds declared before deployment.
When to Use This Skill
- A merged change must be declared for release: tier, artifact, flag, rollout stages, thresholds, rollback, and outcome metric.
- CI must gate a release tag by validating
release.mdagainstthink.mdandplan.md. - A rollout pipeline must decide, for one stage, whether to promote, hold, or roll back.
Path resolution
Resolve references/ and scripts/ relative to this skill's install directory (the folder that contains this SKILL.md), not the consumer repository root or the current shell cwd. If the skill was installed under .agents/skills/release-plan/ or .claude/skills/release-plan/, use that base path.
Workflow
- Read
references/release-contract.mdnow. It is the authoritative source for headings, fields, stage shapes per tier, threshold rules, and rollback mechanisms. - Draft
release.mdfromthink.md(tier and rollback),plan.md(raised tier, file scope), and the Triage hypothesis (outcome metric). Propose thresholds from the tier defaults in the contract. Never invent a baseline: take it from the Triage evidence or leave a question. - Validate with the deterministic script from this skill's directory:
node scripts/validate-release.mjs --release specs/issue-42/release.md \
--think specs/issue-42/think.md --plan specs/issue-42/plan.md
# Or the whole work item directory, plus the git tag in CI
node scripts/validate-release.mjs --dir specs/issue-42 --tag v1.4.0
Treat a nonzero validator exit as invalid output and fix the file rather than ignoring errors. Model compliance is advisory; the script is the enforcement gate.
- In the rollout pipeline, decide each stage with no AI:
node scripts/evaluate-rollout.mjs --release specs/issue-42/release.md --stage canary-5 --metrics metrics.json
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/release-contract.md 15 KB
- references/release.yml 13 KB
- scripts/evaluate-rollout.mjs 6.3 KB runs code
- scripts/evaluate-rollout.test.mjs 11 KB runs code
- scripts/release-fixture.mjs 3.9 KB runs code
- scripts/validate-release.mjs 29 KB runs code
- scripts/validate-release.test.mjs 27 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 53 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A b6a792002ab4
release-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository ALTEN-group/coding-pal (5 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 93 tokens to every session and 803 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-14.
Other skills, from other repositories
land-and-deploy
Land and deploy workflow. (gstack).
publish-site
Versioned site deploys to GitHub/Cloudflare/Netlify Pages.
release-publish
Publish an approved Orchard release.
release-review
Review Orchard deployment manifests.
orchard-release
Check deployment evidence and recovery conditions.
orchard-review
Review a release proposal.