Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alunduil/alunduil-chezmoi --skill codecovgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alunduil/alunduil-chezmoiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alunduil/alunduil-chezmoi/codecov)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alunduil/alunduil-chezmoi/codecov"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alunduil/alunduil-chezmoi/codecov/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alunduil/alunduil-chezmoi/codecov"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alunduil/alunduil-chezmoi/codecov.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.00816 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00408 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00163 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
codecov scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
`https://api.codecov.io` base. Don't shell out to `curl` directly. How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Codecov
Auth is already in env — dot_bashrc exports CODECOV_API_TOKEN. The
codecov-api wrapper in ~/.local/bin/ injects auth + the
https://api.codecov.io base. Don't shell out to curl directly.
Triggers
- "Is
<test>flaky?" / "What's its failure rate?" - "Show failed tests on
<branch>recently." - "Why is
<test>failing?" (stack trace lookup) - "What's the coverage delta on this PR / file / branch?"
- Any Codecov UI URL behind the login wall.
Repo coordinates
Most paths take {service}/{owner}/{repo} where service is one of
github, gitlab, bitbucket (no .com). Derive from the current
checkout via git remote get-url origin.
REST — flaky / failed tests
GET /api/v2/{service}/{owner}/repos/{repo}/test-results/
Verified query parameters:
branch— filter by branch namecommit_id— filter by commit SHAoutcome—pass|failure|skip|errorduration_min/duration_max— secondspage/page_size— pagination
codecov-api "/api/v2/github/<owner>/repos/<repo>/test-results/?branch=main&outcome=failure&page_size=100"
Detail (stack trace, etc.):
codecov-api "/api/v2/github/<owner>/repos/<repo>/test-results/<id>/"
REST has no flake_rate filter and no test-name filter. For a
ranked flake answer, paginate outcome=failure, group by name,
divide by total runs of that name (separate call without outcome),
or use GraphQL.
GraphQL — ranked flake aggregates
POST /graphql/ is the same wrapper:
codecov-api /graphql/ \
-X POST -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"query":"...","variables":{...}}'
Schema entry points worth knowing: repository.testAnalytics.testResults,
repository.testAnalytics.flakeAggregates. When in doubt, fetch the
schema ({ __schema { types { name } } }) and read it.
Coverage queries
The full v2 swagger lives at https://api.codecov.io/api/v2/docs/
— consult it for commits/, report/, pulls/{id}/, compare/
endpoints rather than memorising paths. All take the same {service}/ {owner}/{repo} prefix and the same auth.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 88 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A b7248833795b
codecov is a skill published in the GitHub repository alunduil/alunduil-chezmoi (2 stars, last pushed today), licensed 0BSD. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 816 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
speeding-up-laravel-tests
Use when Laravel/Pest test suites are slow, CI duration is growing, individual tests take seconds, or the user asks to speed up, optimize, or profile tests. Covers factories, fakes, config caching, XDebug/pcov, BCRYPTROUNDS, LazilyRefreshDatabase, and stray HTTP requests.
test-code
Testing philosophy, test types (unit, integration, golden, fuzz, property, benchmark, smoke, E2E), per-language conventions (Rust, Go, Python, TypeScript), file organization, fixtures/mocks, CI strategy, and what NOT to test. Use when writing tests, reviewing test coverage, setting up test infrastructure, or deciding…
mise
Configure pinned mise tools and canonical install, format, check, test, build, and watch tasks shared by hooks and CI.
testing-conventions
Test conventions across this portfolio — regression-test comment format, property-test setup for TS and Python, the financial-math arbitrary settings that were tuned by measurement, and why a failing check may be pinning a defect rather than reporting one. Load before writing tests, adding a regression test to a bug…
test-driven-development
Implement an isolated bug fix or behavior change with an honest red-green-refactor cycle. Use when a regression test should fail before the fix, or when refactors or seams must prove correctness.
playwright
Drive browsers with Python Playwright for end-to-end tests, screenshots, traces, and code generation. Use for browser automation or e2e testing.