Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alvinunreal/lazyskills --skill cli-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alvinunreal/lazyskillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alvinunreal/lazyskills/cli-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alvinunreal/lazyskills/cli-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alvinunreal/lazyskills/cli-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alvinunreal/lazyskills/cli-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alvinunreal/lazyskills/cli-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00524 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00210 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00052 |
Grade C, and why
cli-review scanned grade C with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Downloads and executes remote codehighSupply chain
curl | sh runs whatever the server returns today, which is not necessarily what it returned when this was reviewed.
curl -fsSL "https://greptile.com/cli/install" | sh Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
allowed-tools: Bash(git:*) Bash(greptile:*) Bash(command:*) Bash(curl:*) Bash(npm:*) This is a copy
100% identical to cli-review — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
CLI Review
Run a Greptile review from the local checkout and summarize the findings.
Instructions
1. Confirm repository context
Start from the current repository root:
git rev-parse --show-toplevel
If the command fails, tell the user that the Greptile CLI review must be run from a git repository.
2. Check for the Greptile CLI
Check whether greptile is installed:
command -v greptile
If it is missing, do not install it automatically. Ask the user for permission, then show the recommended install command:
npm i -g greptile
If npm is unavailable, offer the shell installer fallback:
curl -fsSL "https://greptile.com/cli/install" | sh
After installation, re-run command -v greptile.
3. Ensure authentication
Check the signed-in account:
greptile whoami
If the CLI reports that authentication is missing, run:
greptile login
Wait for the user to complete the login flow before continuing.
4. Run the review
Prefer JSON output:
greptile review --json
If JSON output is unsupported or fails with a usage error, fall back to:
greptile review --agent
Do not hide the raw command failure if both commands fail. Summarize the failing command and the next action the user needs to take.
5. Summarize results
Parse JSON output when available and report:
- Review status
- Number of findings
- Highest severity findings first
- Files that need edits
- Suggested next command or fix path
When output is plain text, preserve the same structure as much as possible. Keep the summary concise and focused on actionable findings.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 95 lines · 61 tokens per session scan C 56a93ea9d5da
cli-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository alvinunreal/lazyskills (334 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 524 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it C with 2 findings (downloads and executes remote code, makes network calls). It is 100% identical to cli-review, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-guidelines-go
Go 1.24–1.27 coding guidelines for the dimetron/pi-go AI agent runtime. Use this skill whenever writing, reviewing, or refactoring ANY Go code in pi-go. This covers idiomatic style, error handling, concurrency, project layout, testing (table-driven, fuzz, benchmarks, synctest), new stdlib usage, golangci-lint v2…
design-review
Deep design review of Go codebase — naming, structure, consistency, interfaces, error handling. Scores each dimension and provides actionable fixes.
vhs-e2e-gif
Record a test run, a TUI session, or any terminal command as a GIF with VHS and attach it to a GitHub PR as a release-hosted asset, never a repo commit. Use when asked to record an e2e run, demo a fix on a PR, attach a GIF or screen recording to a pull request, show a test passing visually, or produce a terminal…
agents-md
Generate AGENTS.md files for Go, Rust, TypeScript, and Java projects. Use this skill whenever the user asks to create, scaffold, bootstrap, update, or review an AGENTS.md (or agent-instructions, CLAUDE.md, repo guide for agents) file in a codebase. Also trigger when the user says "add AGENTS.md", "make this repo…
code-review
Run a thorough self-review pass on the most recent change.
code-review-pi
Review code for quality, run linters, check test coverage, fix issues, and enforce gates. Save the final report to ./specs/issues/003-code-review-pi/PROMPT.md. Use before committing changes.