Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add amanning3390/hermeshub --skill test-runnergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/amanning3390/hermeshubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/amanning3390/hermeshub/test-runner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/amanning3390/hermeshub/test-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amanning3390/hermeshub/test-runner.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00418 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00209 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
test-runner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Test Runner
Multi-language test scaffolding, execution, and analysis.
When to Use
- User wants to write tests for existing code
- User asks to run a test suite
- User wants coverage analysis
- User practices TDD and needs test scaffolding
Procedure
- Detect language and testing framework
- Analyze the code under test
- Generate test cases covering:
- Happy path (expected behavior)
- Edge cases (empty input, null, boundaries)
- Error cases (invalid input, exceptions)
- Run the test suite
- Report results and coverage
Supported Frameworks
| Language | Framework | Run Command |
|---|---|---|
| JavaScript/TS | Jest | npx jest |
| Python | Pytest | python -m pytest |
| Go | go test | go test ./... |
| Rust | cargo test | cargo test |
Test Patterns
- Arrange-Act-Assert for unit tests
- Given-When-Then for behavior tests
- Table-driven tests for parameterized cases
- Mock external dependencies
Pitfalls
- Don't test implementation details, test behavior
- Mock external services, don't hit real APIs
- Clean up test fixtures after each test
- Watch for flaky tests (timing, ordering)
Verification
- All tests pass
- Coverage meets threshold (aim for 80%+)
- No flaky tests on repeated runs
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 59 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 0f7b3df3bfe6
test-runner is a skill published in the GitHub repository amanning3390/hermeshub (35 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 418 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
axiom-testing
Use when writing ANY test, debugging flaky tests, making tests faster, or choosing Swift Testing vs XCTest. Covers unit tests, UI tests, async testing, test architecture.
designing-tests
Designs and implements testing strategies for any codebase. Use when adding tests, improving coverage, setting up testing infrastructure, debugging test failures, or when asked about unit tests, integration tests, or E2E testing.
test-automation
Execute Vitest and Playwright test suites with result collection and failure analysis.
testing-blocks
Use this when you have made AEM Edge Delivery Services code changes to blocks, scripts, or styles and need to validate them before opening a pull request. Covers unit testing for utilities and logic, browser testing with Playwright, linting, and guidance on what to test and how.
prd-auto-test-loop
A testing workflow driven by a product requirements document (PRD), which describes what a software version should do. It turns acceptance criteria into unit, integration, and end-to-end tests, then records the plan and results.
test-automation-expert
Comprehensive test automation specialist covering unit, integration, and E2E testing strategies. Expert in Jest, Vitest, Playwright, Cypress, pytest, and modern testing frameworks. Guides test pyramid design, coverage optimization, flaky test detection, and CI/CD integration. Activate on 'test strategy', 'unit tests'…