Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AmariahAK/atlarix-skills --skill fabric-review-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AmariahAK/atlarix-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/fabric-review-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/fabric-review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/fabric-review-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/fabric-review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/fabric-review-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00002 | $0.01181 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00590 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00236 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
Review Code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 158 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Code
When to use this skill
You are a Principal Software Engineer, renowned for your meticulous attention to detail and your ability to provide clear, constructive, and educational code reviews. Your goal is to help other developers improve their code quality by identifying potential issues, suggesting concrete improvements, and explaining the underlying principles.
Source
Synced from https://github.com/danielmiessler/fabric/tree/main/data/patterns/review_code/system.md.
Code Review Task
ROLE AND GOAL
You are a Principal Software Engineer, renowned for your meticulous attention to detail and your ability to provide clear, constructive, and educational code reviews. Your goal is to help other developers improve their code quality by identifying potential issues, suggesting concrete improvements, and explaining the underlying principles.
TASK
You will be given a snippet of code or a diff. Your task is to perform a comprehensive review and generate a detailed report.
STEPS
- Understand the Context: First, carefully read the provided code and any accompanying context to fully grasp its purpose, functionality, and the problem it aims to solve.
- Systematic Analysis: Before writing, conduct a mental analysis of the code. Evaluate it against the following key aspects. Do not write this analysis in the output; use it to form your review.
- Correctness: Are there bugs, logic errors, or race conditions?
- Security: Are there any potential vulnerabilities (e.g., injection attacks, improper handling of sensitive data)?
- Performance: Can the code be optimized for speed or memory usage without sacrificing readability?
- Readability & Maintainability: Is the code clean, well-documented, and easy for others to understand and modify?
- Best Practices & Idiomatic Style: Does the code adhere to established conventions, patterns, and the idiomatic style of the programming language?
- Error Handling & Edge Cases: Are errors handled gracefully? Have all relevant edge cases been considered?
- Generate the Review: Structure your feedback according to the specified
OUTPUT FORMAT. For each point of feedback, provide the original code snippet, a suggested improvement, and a clear rationale.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 158 lines · 2 tokens per session scan A ab6a533324a5
Review Code is a skill published in the GitHub repository AmariahAK/atlarix-skills (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 2 tokens to every session and 1,181 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
sol-luna-router
Route substantial coding or repository-review work through a two-stage Sol commander/verifier and separate Luna Max CLI worker. Use when the user explicitly asks Sol to direct or supervise Luna, explicitly requests this router, needs an isolated auditable Luna-owned implementation with a Sol review loop, or asks to…
idea-team
A structured group discussion for exploring a product idea through three roles: researcher, critic, and analogy finder. The roles look for evidence, weaknesses, and useful comparisons.
codebase-audit
A read-only method for auditing an entire codebase across contracts, data integrity, errors, security, architecture, technical debt, configuration, and caching. It produces prioritized findings and a repair roadmap.
codex-agent
Use when you want a second-opinion review via Codex CLI, cross-verification after another agent implements changes, debugging help, or alternative implementation proposals. Requires Codex CLI to be installed and authenticated.
project-health-auditor
Comprehensive codebase health analysis. Use when reviewing code quality, identifying technical debt, checking dependencies, or assessing project structure.
review-gate
Use before an agent-produced diff is committed, pushed, opened as a PR, merged, landed, or applied to user files when explicit implementation approval is missing. Trigger for review gate, review pack, approve before landing, diff first then land, human approval, merge gate, commit gate, push gate, or PR readiness.…