Review Design

Review Design is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from AmariahAK/atlarix-skills. It costs 2 tokens per session (782 once invoked), scanned C, original, Apache-2.0.

A software architecture review guide for examining system designs, components, diagrams, and external integrations.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for assessing architecture designs and identifying concrete areas for improvement.
Why use it?
It helps reveal unclear responsibilities, unnecessary complexity, weak integrations, and possible security, performance, or reliability problems.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit It is for assessing architecture designs and identifying concrete areas for improvement.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/fabric-review-design
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add AmariahAK/atlarix-skills --skill fabric-review-design
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AmariahAK/atlarix-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for Review Design

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/fabric-review-design/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/fabric-review-design)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/fabric-review-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/fabric-review-design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for Review Design

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/fabric-review-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/fabric-review-design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 2 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 782 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan C 2 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00002 $0.00782
Opus 5 $0.00001 $0.00391
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00156
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00078

Measured 9d ago against content hash 17a742ed5495, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade C, and why

Review Design scanned grade C with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Asks the agent to reveal its instructionsmediumSystem prompt leakage

Directions to print, repeat or translate the system prompt extract configuration the operator did not intend to expose.

# OUTPUT INSTRUCTIONS

Strips warnings and disclaimersmediumAnti-refusal

Omitting safety caveats hides risk from the user and is a common jailbreak preamble.

- Do not give warnings or notes; only output the requested sections.
skills/fabric-review-design/SKILL.md · 79 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review Design

When to use this skill

You are an expert solution architect.

Source

Synced from https://github.com/danielmiessler/fabric/tree/main/data/patterns/review_design/system.md.

IDENTITY and PURPOSE

You are an expert solution architect.

You fully digest input and review design.

Take a step back and think step-by-step about how to achieve the best possible results by following the steps below.

STEPS

Conduct a detailed review of the architecture design. Provide an analysis of the architecture, identifying strengths, weaknesses, and potential improvements in these areas. Specifically, evaluate the following:

  1. Architecture Clarity and Component Design:

    • Analyze the diagrams, including all internal components and external systems.
    • Assess whether the roles and responsibilities of each component are well-defined and if the interactions between them are efficient, logical, and well-documented.
    • Identify any potential areas of redundancy, unnecessary complexity, or unclear responsibilities.
  2. External System Integrations:

    • Evaluate the integrations to external systems.
    • Consider the security, performance, and reliability of these integrations, and whether the system is designed to handle a variety of external clients without compromising performance or security.
  3. Security Architecture:

    • Assess the security mechanisms in place.
    • Identify any potential weaknesses in authentication, authorization, or data protection. Consider whether the design follows best practices.
    • Suggest improvements to harden the security posture, especially regarding access control, and potential attack vectors.
  4. Performance, Scalability, and Resilience:

    • Analyze how the design ensures high performance and scalability, particularly through the use of rate limiting, containerized deployments, and database interactions.
    • Evaluate whether the system can scale horizontally to support increasing numbers of clients or load, and if there are potential bottlenecks.
    • Assess fault tolerance and resilience. Are there any risks to system availability in case of a failure at a specific component?

Read the full file on GitHub · 79 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 79 lines · 2 tokens per session scan C 17a742ed5495

Subscribe to this mod's changes

Review Design is a skill published in the GitHub repository AmariahAK/atlarix-skills (2 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 2 tokens to every session and 782 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 2 findings (asks the agent to reveal its instructions, strips warnings and disclaimers). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

sol-luna-router

Route substantial coding or repository-review work through a two-stage Sol commander/verifier and separate Luna Max CLI worker. Use when the user explicitly asks Sol to direct or supervise Luna, explicitly requests this router, needs an isolated auditable Luna-owned implementation with a Sol review loop, or asks to…

majiayu000/spellbook · 123 tokens

idea-team

A structured group discussion for exploring a product idea through three roles: researcher, critic, and analogy finder. The roles look for evidence, weaknesses, and useful comparisons.

majiayu000/spellbook · 182 tokens

codebase-audit

A read-only method for auditing an entire codebase across contracts, data integrity, errors, security, architecture, technical debt, configuration, and caching. It produces prioritized findings and a repair roadmap.

majiayu000/spellbook · 176 tokens

codex-agent

Use when you want a second-opinion review via Codex CLI, cross-verification after another agent implements changes, debugging help, or alternative implementation proposals. Requires Codex CLI to be installed and authenticated.

majiayu000/spellbook · 45 tokens

project-health-auditor

Comprehensive codebase health analysis. Use when reviewing code quality, identifying technical debt, checking dependencies, or assessing project structure.

majiayu000/spellbook · 31 tokens

review-gate

Use before an agent-produced diff is committed, pushed, opened as a PR, merged, landed, or applied to user files when explicit implementation approval is missing. Trigger for review gate, review pack, approve before landing, diff first then land, human approval, merge gate, commit gate, push gate, or PR readiness.…

majiayu000/spellbook · 95 tokens