Git Workflow

Git Workflow is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from AmariahAK/atlarix-skills. It costs 2 tokens per session (919 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A set of Git practices for organizing branches, commits, and pull requests. It covers conventional commits, which use a consistent format, and keeping each commit focused on one logical change.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps create consistent commit messages and branch names, split work into focused commits, and prepare cleaner pull requests.
Why use it?
It helps keep project history easy to read, review, undo, and maintain when changes span multiple files.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit It helps create consistent commit messages and branch names, split work into focused commits, and prepare cleaner pull requests.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/git-workflow
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add AmariahAK/atlarix-skills --skill git-workflow
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AmariahAK/atlarix-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for Git Workflow

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/git-workflow.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/git-workflow)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/git-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amariahak/atlarix-skills/git-workflow.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 2 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 919 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00002 $0.00919
Opus 5 $0.00001 $0.00460
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00184
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00092

Measured 4d ago against content hash fe7544bb2f74, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

Git Workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/git-workflow/SKILL.md · 124 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 124 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Git Workflow

When to use this skill

Use this skill when you want a clean Git history (easy reviews, easy rollbacks) and consistent PR hygiene—especially when an agent is helping you make changes across multiple files.

Core patterns

Conventional commits (recommended)

Format:

<type>(<scope>): <summary>

Types:

  • feat: new behavior or capability
  • fix: bug fix
  • refactor: behavior-preserving code change
  • docs: documentation only
  • test: tests only
  • chore: tooling, deps, CI, non-product changes

Examples:

  • fix(chat): always emit response end on errors
  • feat(skills): add registry scaffolding and validation
  • refactor(compaction): centralize execution path

Breaking changes:

  • Add ! after type/scope: feat(api)!: change auth token format
  • Or add BREAKING CHANGE: in body

Branch naming

Use a consistent prefix:

  • feat/<short-kebab>
  • fix/<short-kebab>
  • docs/<short-kebab>
  • chore/<short-kebab>

Examples:

  • feat/skills-registry
  • fix/stream-terminal-event

Atomic commits

Rule: one logical change per commit.

Good:

  • Commit 1: “Add tool contract block”
  • Commit 2: “Update read_attachment prompt examples”

Bad:

  • “Fix everything” commit that mixes UI, backend, and docs

Squash vs merge vs rebase

  • Squash merge: best for feature branches with messy WIP commits
  • Merge commit: best when you want to preserve full branch context (rare for small changes)
  • Rebase: good for keeping a linear history, but be careful on shared branches

Guideline:

  • If a PR has 10+ micro commits (“fix lint”, “oops”), squash before merging.
  • If commits are already atomic and readable, merge without squashing.

Writing PR descriptions (what/why/how/testing)

Good PRs are reviewable because they explain intent:

Template:

  • What changed: the user-visible / system-visible behavior
  • Why: the problem or constraint
  • How: the approach (short)
  • Test plan: exact commands + manual steps

Conflict resolution workflow

When conflicts happen:

  1. Rebase or merge main into your branch
  2. Resolve conflicts by choosing intent, not just “keep both”
  3. Re-run tests
  4. Confirm build/typecheck

Read the full file on GitHub · 124 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 124 lines · 2 tokens per session scan A fe7544bb2f74

Subscribe to this mod's changes

Git Workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository AmariahAK/atlarix-skills (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 2 tokens to every session and 919 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.