amby-implement

A skill that executes the next available implementation tasks in an AmbyKit project. It follows task dependencies and updates the project documents as work is completed.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to implement unblocked tasks, connect changes to requirements and acceptance criteria, add tests, and mark completed work.
Why use it?
It helps prevent work from starting out of order and keeps the task list and feature status aligned with the code.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ambystechcom/ambykit/amby-implement
Any agent
npx skills add ambystechcom/AmbyKit --skill amby-implement
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ambystechcom/AmbyKit

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 21 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 365 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00021 $0.00365
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00182
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00073
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00036

Measured 2d ago against content hash 3798e7c91e30, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

amby-implement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/amby-implement/SKILL.md · 21 lines

What it actually says

Act as the Developer in @.amby/roles/developer.md and say so in your first line. If the user's request that followed this skill invocation contains --as <id>, use @.amby/roles/<id>.md instead; if that file is missing, stop and list the files in .amby/roles/.

Implement work for the user's request that followed this skill invocation (default: the next unblocked task in priority order).

  1. From tasks.md, pick the target task(s). Respect the Foundational-before-features gate and the story dependency graph — never start a task whose story is blocked-by unfinished work.
  2. Load only the slice you need: the task line, the relevant plan.md section, and the specific files named. Don't read the whole spec tree (token-frugal).
  3. Implement to satisfy the mapped FR-###/acceptance criteria and the constitution. Add/adjust tests for the acceptance criteria.
  4. Patch in place: flip the completed task's checkbox to - [x] in tasks.md; when all of a story's tasks are done, set that story's status: done in spec.md (or in-progress while partway). Don't rewrite untouched sections.
  5. Report what you did and the next unblocked task. Stop at a story checkpoint for review.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 21 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 3798e7c91e30

Subscribe to this mod's changes

amby-implement is a skill published in the GitHub repository ambystechcom/AmbyKit (2 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 365 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

importing-a-codebase

Use when the repo holds real source code but no specs: the existing-codebase branch of setting-up-a-project, normally reached via that dispatcher, directly only when the situation is unmistakable. Not for empty workspaces (starting-a-new-project) or feature work in a specced project (brainstorming).

JetBrains/thinkrail · 69 tokens

starting-a-new-project

Use when the workspace is empty — no code yet — and the user brings a raw idea: the brand-new branch of setting-up-a-project, normally reached via that dispatcher, directly only when the situation is unmistakable. Not for features in an existing project — use brainstorming instead.

JetBrains/thinkrail · 61 tokens

todos

This chat has a shared, live TODO plan — your tasks for the conversation, which the user also edits. Read this skill and reach for the todo tools whenever a request takes more than a couple of steps. It covers the plan model (group = task, items = its steps; loose items are the user's lane), how to work it: propose…

JetBrains/thinkrail · 127 tokens

writing-workflow-skills

Use when adding a new workflow skill to pi-thinkrail-workflow, changing an existing workflow skill's role, trigger, handoff, or structure, or checking a workflow skill against the workflow system's rules. Not for authoring general-purpose skills outside this package.

JetBrains/thinkrail · 60 tokens

brainstorming

Use this BEFORE any creative or feature work: building a new feature, adding functionality, changing behavior, or making a nontrivial design decision. Turns the user's request into a validated design — recorded as a spec-graph task-spec — before any implementation. Do not skip this because a change looks small.

JetBrains/thinkrail · 65 tokens

reviewing-changes

Use when a review package asks you to review a plan step's change set (todo.startReview): you are the REVIEWER, not the author. How to judge an agent-written diff, file findings with addreviewcomment, and settle with exactly one reviewverdict.

JetBrains/thinkrail · 59 tokens