Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add amonstack/gitea_mcp --skill gitea-find-pullsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/amonstack/gitea_mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/amonstack/gitea_mcp/gitea-find-pulls)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/amonstack/gitea_mcp/gitea-find-pulls"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amonstack/gitea_mcp/gitea-find-pulls/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/amonstack/gitea_mcp/gitea-find-pulls"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amonstack/gitea_mcp/gitea-find-pulls.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00139 | $0.00849 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00056 | $0.00340 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00170 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
gitea-find-pulls scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 44 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
gitea-find-pulls
When to use
Trigger when the user asks to list / search / read pull requests — 中文请求如「看看开放的 PR」「这个 PR 改了哪些文件」「搜一下相关的合并请求」也 MUST 走本 skill。
Read-only pull request discovery. Tools: list_pull_requests, search_issues, get_pull_request, list_pull_commits, list_pull_files.
Prerequisites
- Resolve
owner+repoforlist_pull_requests/get_pull_request/list_pull_commits/list_pull_files: pass explicitly, elseGITEA_DEFAULT_OWNER/GITEA_DEFAULT_REPO, elseresolve_repo(gitea-resolve-repo). Never guess — wrong values 404 or silently target the wrong repo. - Paginate 1-based,
limit≤ 100. A page is final ONLY when it returns fewer thanlimititems. Always setlimit(default page size is server-controlled).
Choose the tool
- ONE repo's PRs, filtered by state/labels/sort/milestone →
list_pull_requests. - ACROSS repos by keyword →
search_issues({ type: "pulls" })(global; no owner/repo). - ONE PR's full detail (branches, mergeable, merged) →
get_pull_request. - Commits in one PR →
list_pull_commits. - Files changed in one PR →
list_pull_files.
list_pull_requests
- RULES:
labels= comma-separated NAMES, AND-matched; a mistyped or non-existent name returns EMPTY with no error.sortoptions:oldest,recentupdate,leastupdate,mostcomment,leastcomment,priority.statedefault isopen. - CHECK FIRST: confirm label names via
list_labels(gitea-manage-labels) before filtering by labels. - CHECK AFTER: if
length === limit, fetch the next page before treating the list as complete.
search_issues
- RULES: GLOBAL — no owner/repo; each result carries its own
repository. Settype: "pulls"to search only PRs.labels= names.querymatches title + body. - CHECK FIRST: set
typedeliberately. - CHECK AFTER: page fully if completeness matters.
get_pull_request
- RULES: pass
index= the PRnumber(URL #42 → 42), never the internalid. - NOTE: the response carries
mergeable(boolean),merged(boolean),merged_at,draft, plusbase/headbranch objects. Checkmergeablebefore attempting a merge (gitea-merge-pull).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +4 lines · +45 tokens per session 8fa68bd66ecb
- 1mo ago First seen · 40 lines · 94 tokens per session scan A ecc225d3d343
gitea-find-pulls is a skill published in the GitHub repository amonstack/gitea_mcp (1 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 139 tokens to every session and 849 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.
merge-batch
Prepare and merge an owner-selected PR batch with contributor credit and exact-candidate admission. Use for a pasted PR list; combined focused validation is diagnostic, and every actual landing still requires its applicable checks and authorization.
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
verify-behavior
Verify or reproduce visible product behavior by driving the real UI with pi-computer-use's checked tools, requiring verified expect postconditions and durable state evidence for meaningful UI flows. Use when triage needs visual reproduction, implementation needs behavioral proof, review needs interactive confirmation…