Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add amonstack/gitea_mcp --skill gitea-label-issuegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/amonstack/gitea_mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/amonstack/gitea_mcp/gitea-label-issue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/amonstack/gitea_mcp/gitea-label-issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amonstack/gitea_mcp/gitea-label-issue/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/amonstack/gitea_mcp/gitea-label-issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/amonstack/gitea_mcp/gitea-label-issue.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00119 | $0.00527 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00048 | $0.00211 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
gitea-label-issue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
gitea-label-issue
When to use
Trigger when the user asks to label / tag / relabel / unlabel an issue or PR — 中文请求如「给这个 issue 打个 bug 标签」「把标签清掉」「换成 enhancement」也 MUST 走本 skill。
Manage the labels ON one issue. Tools: list_labels, add_issue_labels, replace_issue_labels, remove_issue_label, clear_issue_labels.
Prerequisites
- Resolve
owner+repo: pass explicitly, elseGITEA_DEFAULT_OWNER/GITEA_DEFAULT_REPO, elseresolve_repo(gitea-resolve-repo).
CRITICAL — name vs id (the endpoints are inconsistent)
- BY NAME (string[]):
add_issue_labels,replace_issue_labels. - BY ID (number):
remove_issue_label(paramid). Resolve names→ids vialist_labelswhen you need an id.
Choose the tool
- ADD labels (keep existing) →
add_issue_labels({ index, labels: [names] }). - SET the exact label set (overwrites all) →
replace_issue_labels({ index, labels: [names] }). - REMOVE ONE label →
remove_issue_label({ index, id })(id, not name). - REMOVE ALL →
clear_issue_labels({ index }).
Rules
index= issuenumber(URL #N → N).- Adding a non-existent NAME → 404. Confirm names via
list_labelsfirst. - Scoped/exclusive labels (
scope/name) are mutually exclusive within a scope — adding one may replace another in the same scope. - CHECK FIRST: for
replace,get_issue(gitea-find-issues) to see current labels so you don't drop one unintentionally; forremove,list_labelsto resolve the id.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +4 lines · +37 tokens per session ca487783467e
- 1mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A d5b3568fe463
gitea-label-issue is a skill published in the GitHub repository amonstack/gitea_mcp (1 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 119 tokens to every session and 527 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
story-readiness
Is a story implementation-ready? Checks clear acceptance criteria, open questions, ADR refs. READY/NEEDS WORK/BLOCKED/NOT ASSESSED.
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
projects
List all managed projects with status, branch, open PRs, and open issue counts — portfolio-level view.
handle-linkedin-connection-request-signal
Use this skill when someone sends a team member an inbound LinkedIn connection request. An inbound request is a deliberate, ACTIVE first-party intent signal — meaningfully stronger than a passive profile view — and it deserves different scoring rules. The skill resolves and enriches the requester, gates them through…