Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/anantadwi13/explorer/openspec-proposenpx skills add anantadwi13/explorer --skill openspec-proposegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anantadwi13/explorerWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00047 | $0.01044 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00522 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00209 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00104 |
Grade A, and why
openspec-propose scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to openspec-propose — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Propose a new change - create the change and generate all artifacts in one step.
I'll create a change with artifacts:
- proposal.md (what & why)
- design.md (how)
- tasks.md (implementation steps)
When ready to implement, run /opsx:apply
Input: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.
Steps
-
If no clear input provided, ask what they want to build
Use the AskUserQuestion tool (open-ended, no preset options) to ask:
"What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" →
add-user-auth).IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
-
Create the change directory
openspec new change "<name>"This creates a scaffolded change at
openspec/changes/<name>/with.openspec.yaml. -
Get the artifact build order
openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonParse the JSON to get:
applyRequires: array of artifact IDs needed before implementation (e.g.,["tasks"])artifacts: list of all artifacts with their status and dependencies
-
Create artifacts in sequence until apply-ready
Use the TodoWrite tool to track progress through the artifacts.
Loop through artifacts in dependency order (artifacts with no pending dependencies first):
a. For each artifact that is
ready(dependencies satisfied):- Get instructions:
openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json - The instructions JSON includes:
context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)template: The structure to use for your output fileinstruction: Schema-specific guidance for this artifact typeoutputPath: Where to write the artifactdependencies: Completed artifacts to read for context
- Read any completed dependency files for context
- Create the artifact file using
templateas the structure - Apply
contextandrulesas constraints - but do NOT copy them into the file - Show brief progress: "Created "
b. Continue until all
applyRequiresartifacts are complete- After creating each artifact, re-run
openspec status --change "<name>" --json - Check if every artifact ID in
applyRequireshasstatus: "done"in the artifacts array - Stop when all
applyRequiresartifacts are done
c. If an artifact requires user input (unclear context):
- Use AskUserQuestion tool to clarify
- Then continue with creation
- Get instructions:
-
Show final status
openspec status --change "<name>"
Output
After completing all artifacts, summarize:
- Change name and location
- List of artifacts created with brief descriptions
- What's ready: "All artifacts created! Ready for implementation."
- Prompt: "Run
/opsx:applyor ask me to implement to start working on the tasks."
Artifact Creation Guidelines
- Follow the
instructionfield fromopenspec instructionsfor each artifact type - The schema defines what each artifact should contain - follow it
- Read dependency artifacts for context before creating new ones
- Use
templateas the structure for your output file - fill in its sections - IMPORTANT:
contextandrulesare constraints for YOU, not content for the file- Do NOT copy
<context>,<rules>,<project_context>blocks into the artifact - These guide what you write, but should never appear in the output
- Do NOT copy
Guardrails
- Create ALL artifacts needed for implementation (as defined by schema's
apply.requires) - Always read dependency artifacts before creating a new one
- If context is critically unclear, ask the user - but prefer making reasonable decisions to keep momentum
- If a change with that name already exists, ask if user wants to continue it or create a new one
- Verify each artifact file exists after writing before proceeding to next
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 111 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 88ad070e3025
openspec-propose is a skill published in the GitHub repository anantadwi13/explorer (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,044 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to openspec-propose, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
frontend-design-saas
S-tier SaaS dashboard and product UI reference. Use this skill when building application shells, data tables, settings panels, billing pages, dashboards, auth flows, admin tools, or any internal/customer-facing SaaS product UI. Inspired by Stripe, Linear, Vercel, Airbnb, Notion. Covers neutral-led design tokens…
commit-push-pr
Commit selected local changes, push the branch, and create or update a GitHub pull request with BitFun attribution. Use when the user asks to 提交 PR、提代码、commit and push、开 PR、create a pull request, or wants a Claude Code-like one-command PR publishing flow from BitFun.
skill-prompt-convert
在 Skill(SKILL.md)与 Prompt(聊天框指令)两种格式之间相互转换。支持 Skill→Prompt 与 Prompt→Skill 双向转换,保持核心信息零丢失。当用户提到 Skill 转 Prompt、Prompt 转 Skill、格式互转、SKILL.md 转换时使用。.
issue-reporter
只在用户明确要求提交 GitHub Issue、GitHub Bug Report 或 GitHub Feature Request 时使用。用户只说“提交问题”“提交反馈”“上报 bug”“这是个 bug”或描述功能建议但未点名 GitHub 时不得触发,必须改用 cherry-studio-feedback 并默认提交飞书。.
code-mate-antigravity
Runs Antigravity CLI headlessly for repository analysis and coding tasks. Use when the user asks to delegate work to Antigravity CLI or compare its result with another coding agent.
code-mate-kimi-code
Runs Kimi Code in non-interactive prompt mode and parses its event stream. Use when the user asks to delegate a bounded repository task to Kimi Code.