Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-config --skill plan-to-ticketsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-configWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/plan-to-tickets)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/plan-to-tickets"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/plan-to-tickets/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/plan-to-tickets"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/plan-to-tickets.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.00591 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00236 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00118 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
plan-to-tickets scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Plan To Tickets
Turn a large plan into small, independently executable tickets. Use this before handing a broad plan to agents, before long autonomous work, or when the user asks for tickets/issues/slices.
Output Location
If no issue tracker is explicitly selected, write local tickets under:
<project>/.agent/tickets/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>/
Each ticket is one Markdown file:
TICKET-001-short-slug.md
Required Ticket Shape
Each ticket must include these headings exactly:
## Status## Parent## What To Build## Acceptance Criteria## Verification## Blocked By## Notes
## Status must contain ready-for-agent only when all acceptance criteria and verification steps are concrete.
## Acceptance Criteria must contain checklist items (- [ ] ...).
## Verification must contain at least one command, script, test, artifact check, or explicit manual-review gate.
Slicing Rules
- Prefer vertical tracer bullets: a narrow complete path through the required layers, not "all backend" then "all UI" then "all tests".
- A ticket must be independently verifiable.
- Put prefactoring first only when it makes a later slice smaller or safer.
- Keep dependencies explicit in
## Blocked By; writeNonewhen it can start immediately. - Do not include stale-prone file paths unless the path is already a stable contract or current codebase evidence.
- Do not publish external tracker issues unless the user asked for that tracker.
Workflow
- Read the plan/spec and current repo context needed to avoid fake tickets.
- Draft ticket files in dependency order.
- Run the validator:
python "$env:USERPROFILE\.claude\claude-code-config\scripts\validate_agent_tickets.py" --tickets-dir <ticket-dir>
- Fix every validator failure before claiming the ticket split is ready.
- Report the ticket directory and the count of ready tickets.
Gotchas
- Horizontal tickets overload later agents. If a ticket cannot be verified alone, split it differently.
- "Implement feature" is not an acceptance criterion. ACs must describe observable behavior or artifacts.
- "Run tests" alone is weak verification. Name the test command or the artifact that proves success.
- Do not use this to postpone work. Ticketization is for large plans; small tasks should be implemented directly.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 66 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A a463758ffb33
plan-to-tickets is a skill published in the GitHub repository AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-config (212 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 591 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
zero-to-prod-orchestrator
Master orchestrator to build an application from scratch to a production-ready release, enforcing strict step-by-step progression and continuous documentation / Orkestrator utama untuk membangun aplikasi dari nol hingga rilis siap produksi dengan dokumentasi bertahap.
launch
Planning releases and reporting delivery work from GitHub PR history. Use when versioning, CHANGELOGs, rollout or rollback plans, engineering metrics, retrospectives, or stakeholder reports are needed.
pdm
Navigating delivery status read-only: reconciles planned scope (specs/roadmap/PRD) against implemented code for what's built vs left. Not for priority scoring (Rank) or AC conformance (Attest).
sherpa
Guiding workflows by decomposing complex tasks (Epics) into Atomic Steps under 15 minutes each, with progress tracking and drift prevention. Use when complex decomposition is needed.
monorepo-architect
Expert guide for designing and managing scalable monorepos using Turborepo, pnpm workspaces, and shared packages / Panduan ahli untuk merancang dan mengelola monorepo skalabel menggunakan Turborepo dan pnpm workspaces.
screenpipe-meeting-follow-up
Capture decisions and commitments after a meeting and draft a concise follow-up.