Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/proof-verifynpx skills add AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-config --skill proof-verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-configWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/proof-verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/proof-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/proof-verify.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00118 | $0.02462 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00059 | $0.01231 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00492 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00246 |
Grade A, and why
proof-verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 279 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Proof Verify
Plan-based verification: freeze acceptance criteria BEFORE building, verify AFTER with independent agents.
When to Use
- After completing a feature/fix that was built from a plan
- When you need independent confirmation that work meets spec
- When the builder should NOT verify their own work
- Trigger phrases: "verify against plan", "check the implementation", "proof check", "independent review"
The Pattern
PHASE 1: PLAN (before any code)
Create .proof/PLAN.md with numbered acceptance criteria
Each AC: testable, specific, has a verification command or check
Plan is FROZEN - no changes during build
PHASE 2: BUILD (normal work)
Implement against the plan
Mark progress in .proof/PROGRESS.md
Builder does NOT self-verify
PHASE 3: VERIFY (after build, independent agent)
Fresh agent reads PLAN.md (never saw the build process)
Walks through each AC, runs verification commands
Writes .proof/VERDICT.md with PASS/FAIL per criterion
If any FAIL → .proof/PROBLEMS.md with specific fixes
PHASE 4: FIX (if needed)
Builder reads PROBLEMS.md, makes minimal fixes
Back to PHASE 3 (re-verify)
Loop until all PASS
Stage Ledger - only when proof feeds another stage
For a release, integration, migration, hardware, signer, or other multi-stage task, a green check is not enough. The next stage needs a stable input, not a summary that the previous stage once looked good.
- Freeze the stage contract and its scope before building it.
- Run the focused proof and obtain the fresh verdict as usual.
- Write the stage to
.proof/stage-ledger.jsonasVERIFIEDorSEALED. A sealed stage records its source commit/tree, contract digest, named input and output digests, fresh verdict digest, and invalidation keys. - A downstream stage names the sealed parent and exact output digest it consumes.
It must not consume a merely
VERIFIEDorBLOCKEDstage. - If an external dependency is missing, record
BLOCKEDwith the exact missing prerequisite. Do not invalidate the sealed upstream code. - If code, contract, or an input digest changes, add a
SUPERSEDEDsuccessor and re-run proof for that successor; do not overwrite the old receipt.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 279 lines · 118 tokens per session scan A 643a15b86362
proof-verify is a skill published in the GitHub repository AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-config (147 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 118 tokens to every session and 2,462 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-content-filter
Professional Ai Content Filter Expert skill. Integrate LLM API workflows, safe system prompt guidelines, and agentic workflows.
ai-engineer
Professional Ai Engineer skill. Integrate LLM API workflows, safe system prompt guidelines, and agentic workflows.
ai-product-manager
Professional Ai Product Manager Expert skill. Integrate LLM API workflows, safe system prompt guidelines, and agentic workflows.
embedding-architect
Professional Embedding Architect skill. Integrate LLM API workflows, safe system prompt guidelines, and agentic workflows.
eval-harness
Professional Eval Harness Expert skill. Integrate LLM API workflows, safe system prompt guidelines, and agentic workflows.
feature-engineer
Professional Feature Engineer skill. Integrate LLM API workflows, safe system prompt guidelines, and agentic workflows.