verify-this

verify-this is a skill for Claude Code from AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-config. It costs 86 tokens per session (1,023 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A method for proving one specific claim about software by comparing a baseline with a changed version. It uses repeatable evidence such as test output, timings, screenshots, responses, traces, or memory snapshots.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to check concrete behavior, speed, UI changes, command-line tools, APIs, or memory use.
Why use it?
It replaces a general statement that something works with a measurable comparison and one clear verdict. This helps show whether a fix actually changed the behavior or performance.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the claude-code-config plugin — 57 skills, 8 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to check concrete behavior, speed, UI changes, command-line tools, APIs, or memory use.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/verify-this
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-config --skill verify-this
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-config

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install claude-code-config, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 57 skills, 8 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for verify-this

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/verify-this.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/verify-this)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/verify-this"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anastasiyaw/codex-claude-code-config/verify-this.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 86 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,023 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00086 $0.01023
Opus 5 $0.00043 $0.00511
Sonnet 5 $0.00017 $0.00205
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00102

Measured 8d ago against content hash bda840736184, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

verify-this scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/development/verify-this/SKILL.md · 100 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 100 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Verify This

Verification is a falsifiable comparison, not a recap of what the agent believes it changed. Turn one claim into a measurable check and preserve enough evidence for another agent to repeat it.

Workflow

  1. Restate the claim as a condition, metric, and threshold. If the claim cannot be measured, ask for a measurable form or classify it as INCONCLUSIVE.
  2. Select the smallest local surface that can disprove it.
  3. Capture a baseline from the parent commit, merge base, current failing reproducer, or unchanged fixture.
  4. Capture treatment with the same command, data, warmup, environment, and measurement method.
  5. Compare raw artifacts: test output, timings, screenshots, HTTP responses, traces, profiles, or heap snapshots. Do not compare summaries alone.
  6. Return exactly one verdict: VERIFIED, NOT VERIFIED, or INCONCLUSIVE.

Evidence Contract

Record:

  • claim and threshold;
  • revision or baseline identity for both runs;
  • frozen contract and stage identity when this result will feed later work;
  • exact commands and input fixture;
  • environment differences and skipped checks;
  • artifact paths or hashes, with sensitive payloads kept outside public Git;
  • the verdict and one short explanation of confounders.

For durable project work, use the repository's existing proof artifact location, for example .agent/tasks/<task-id>/verification/<claim-slug>/. Temporary or sensitive evidence may stay outside the repository; retain only safe metadata and hashes in the project. Never put credentials, private prompts, customer data, or heap contents in a public checkout.

Verdict Rules

  • VERIFIED: baseline and treatment move in the predicted direction, meet the stated threshold, and have no material confound.
  • NOT VERIFIED: behavior is unchanged, moves the wrong way, or misses the threshold.
  • INCONCLUSIVE: there is no valid baseline, the signal is too noisy, the command failed, or the environments are not comparable.

Use this output shape:

Read the full file on GitHub · 100 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 100 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A bda840736184

Subscribe to this mod's changes

verify-this is a skill published in the GitHub repository AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-config (149 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 1,023 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

eval-harness

Professional Eval Harness Expert skill. Integrate LLM API workflows, safe system prompt guidelines, and agentic workflows.

AtulPurohit/Antigravity-Awesome-Skills · 27 tokens

promptfoo-redteam-setup

Create or refine promptfoo redteam setup configs: purpose, targets, plugins, strategies, frameworks, multi-input target inputs, policy text, grader guidance, contexts, and static-code-derived target/threat mapping. Use when preparing a red team scan plan from live probes, code evidence, or provider configs, or when…

promptfoo/promptfoo · 99 tokens

promptfoo-provider-setup

Configure promptfoo providers or redteam targets for hosted models, live HTTP APIs, Python/JavaScript local scripts, agent SDKs, or multi-input systems. Use when connecting promptfoo to the system under test, mapping vars, auth env vars, request bodies, response transforms, or static-code-derived provider wrappers. Do…

promptfoo/promptfoo · 91 tokens

promptfoo-redteam-run

Run, rerun, inspect, and QA promptfoo redteam scans from generated redteam YAML or an existing redteam setup config. Use when executing promptfoo redteam eval or promptfoo redteam run, exporting results, triaging attack success rate, grader failures, target errors, filter/rerun commands, reports, or CI gates. Do not…

promptfoo/promptfoo · 94 tokens

discount-review

Inspect the discount policy fixture with a repeatable review checklist and helper script.

promptfoo/promptfoo · 18 tokens

code-review

Reviews code for bugs, security issues, and best practices.

promptfoo/promptfoo · 11 tokens