Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add anbeime/skill --skill contract-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anbeime/skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anbeime/skill/contract-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anbeime/skill/contract-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anbeime/skill/contract-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anbeime/skill/contract-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anbeime/skill/contract-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.01239 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.00496 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00248 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00124 |
Grade A, and why
contract-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
26 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- LICENSE.txt 11 KB
- references/checklist.md 5.3 KB
- references/examples.md 5.5 KB
- references/flowchart.md 1.8 KB
- references/language.md 2.0 KB
- references/opinion.md 1.3 KB
- references/summary.md 2.8 KB
- references/technical.md 2.7 KB
- scripts/__init__.py 50 B runs code
- scripts/contract_analyzer.py 9.2 KB runs code
- scripts/document.py 11 KB runs code
- scripts/error_handling.py 16 KB runs code
- scripts/mermaid_renderer.py 6.9 KB runs code
- scripts/ooxml/__init__.py 189 B runs code
- scripts/ooxml/pack.py 3.5 KB runs code
- scripts/ooxml/unpack.py 1.1 KB runs code
- scripts/ooxml/validate.py 1.7 KB runs code
- scripts/ooxml/validation/__init__.py 433 B runs code
- scripts/ooxml/validation/base.py 1.5 KB runs code
- scripts/ooxml/validation/docx.py 311 B runs code
- scripts/ooxml/validation/pptx.py 274 B runs code
- scripts/ooxml/validation/redlining.py 217 B runs code
- scripts/opinion_renderer.py 4.2 KB runs code
- scripts/summary_renderer.py 9.1 KB runs code
- scripts/utilities.py 3.1 KB runs code
- scripts/workflow.py 59 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 137 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A ea96e2de0776
contract-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository anbeime/skill (8,649 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 1,239 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
triage-nda
Rapidly triage an incoming NDA and classify it as GREEN (standard approval), YELLOW (counsel review), or RED (full legal review). Use when a new NDA arrives from sales or business development, when screening for embedded non-solicits, non-competes, or missing carveouts, or when deciding whether an NDA can be signed…
dependency-audit
Assesses what a project depends on — known vulnerabilities, licence obligations, abandoned packages, and supply chain risk. Use this whenever the user asks what their dependencies look like, mentions a CVE or security advisory, needs a licence review, is evaluating whether to adopt a library, or has a dependency tree…
okhp3-sharepoint-library-accessibility-review
Review selected SharePoint library documents for supplied accessibility and structure checks, then return an evidence-led remediation draft. Use when document visitors need more usable content. Do not use to certify accessibility or alter files automatically.
okhp3-sharepoint-library-contract-extractor
Extract specified obligation, renewal, notice, owner, counterparty, and risk fields from selected SharePoint contract files into a review queue. Use when contracts need operational visibility. Do not use to interpret legal obligations, update records, or send notices automatically.
okhp3-sharepoint-library-records-readiness-review
Review selected SharePoint library files against supplied records-readiness criteria and return a source-linked human review queue. Use when retention or record treatment needs a visible decision point. Do not use to apply labels or make retention decisions automatically.
pentest-engagement-planner
Define legal scope, rules of engagement, and authorization artifacts for downstream pentest execution.