Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add anbeime/skill --skill security-scangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anbeime/skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anbeime/skill/security-scan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anbeime/skill/security-scan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anbeime/skill/security-scan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anbeime/skill/security-scan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anbeime/skill/security-scan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00618 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00247 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00124 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
security-scan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 43 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 5ed7fe98b819
security-scan is a skill published in the GitHub repository anbeime/skill (8,649 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 618 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-02.
Other skills, from other repositories
triage-nda
Rapidly triage an incoming NDA and classify it as GREEN (standard approval), YELLOW (counsel review), or RED (full legal review). Use when a new NDA arrives from sales or business development, when screening for embedded non-solicits, non-competes, or missing carveouts, or when deciding whether an NDA can be signed…
dependency-audit
Assesses what a project depends on — known vulnerabilities, licence obligations, abandoned packages, and supply chain risk. Use this whenever the user asks what their dependencies look like, mentions a CVE or security advisory, needs a licence review, is evaluating whether to adopt a library, or has a dependency tree…
okhp3-sharepoint-library-accessibility-review
Review selected SharePoint library documents for supplied accessibility and structure checks, then return an evidence-led remediation draft. Use when document visitors need more usable content. Do not use to certify accessibility or alter files automatically.
okhp3-sharepoint-library-contract-extractor
Extract specified obligation, renewal, notice, owner, counterparty, and risk fields from selected SharePoint contract files into a review queue. Use when contracts need operational visibility. Do not use to interpret legal obligations, update records, or send notices automatically.
okhp3-sharepoint-library-records-readiness-review
Review selected SharePoint library files against supplied records-readiness criteria and return a source-linked human review queue. Use when retention or record treatment needs a visible decision point. Do not use to apply labels or make retention decisions automatically.
pentest-engagement-planner
Define legal scope, rules of engagement, and authorization artifacts for downstream pentest execution.