Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ANcpLua/ancplua-claude-plugins --skill binlog-failure-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ANcpLua/ancplua-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/binlog-failure-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/binlog-failure-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/binlog-failure-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/binlog-failure-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ancplua/ancplua-claude-plugins/binlog-failure-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00239 | $0.04152 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00120 | $0.02076 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00048 | $0.00830 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00415 |
Grade A, and why
binlog-failure-analysis scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
- **`curl`** for the AzDO REST artifact download. How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 262 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Binlog Failure Analysis (reuse AzDO binlog, don't rebuild)
Analyze a failed AzDO PR build by reading the binlog that build already produced, not by re-running the local build (./build.sh -bl or equivalent) on a GitHub Actions runner. This is the AI-build-failure-analyst pattern: it makes the analyst run cheap enough to be turned on for every failing PR sync.
🛑 NEVER use
gh pr review --approveor--request-changes. Only--commentis allowed. Approval and blocking are human-only actions.
Workflow: gate on check_run: completed → resolve PR + build id → download AzDO artifact → ask the binlog MCP server for the build overview, errors, and warnings (drilling into root-cause diagnostics or property-value tracing when the basics aren't enough) → group symptoms by root cause → post a single summary comment → optionally attach ≤10 inline suggestion blocks. The agent drives the analysis; tools provide the data.
When to use
- A GitHub PR check from app slug
azure-pipelines(or the repo's AzDO check slug) transitions tofailure. - The pipeline publishes a binlog artifact (arcade-onboarded repos do this via
eng/common/core-templates/steps/publish-logs.yml; arbitrary AzDO pipelines may not). - You want a structured per-PR comment with grouped root causes and concrete
suggestionblocks — not just a link to the raw log.
When NOT to use
- The PR has no AzDO check (GH-Actions-only repos) — use a rebuild-based skill instead, or wait for an AzDO migration.
- The pipeline doesn't publish a binlog artifact — there's nothing to reuse.
- You want pipeline-wide health analysis across many builds — use
ci-analysisorpipeline-investigation. - You want to investigate a non-build leg failure (test failures, Helix work item failures) — see
helix-investigation.
Prerequisites
binlogMCP server —Microsoft.AITools.BinlogMcpis wired inplugins/dotnet-dnceng/plugin.jsonunder the namespacebinlog. The same server is also published bydotnet/skills/dotnet-msbuildunder the samebinlogname, so installing both plugins resolves to a single MCP instance. This skill invokes the server's capabilities semantically (build overview, error list, warning list, root-cause diagnose, property-value trace, structured search, task details, tasks-in-target) — discover the exact tool names for your server version viatools/list. WithMicrosoft.AITools.BinlogMcp, typical names start withbinlog_(e.g.,binlog_overview,binlog_errors); the server exposes ~29 tools total.curlfor the AzDO REST artifact download.jqfor parsing the AzDO artifacts JSON and the GitHub check-runs payload (Step 2 +references/azdo-artifact-fetch.md).unzipfor extracting the artifact.- Azure DevOps access:
- Anonymous read for
dev.azure.com/dnceng-public/public— no token needed. - For
devdiv/DevDivordnceng/internal: a federated identity (azure/login@v2) orazureauth ado token. Seereferences/azdo-artifact-fetch.md.
- Anonymous read for
ghCLI for posting the summary comment + inline review comments.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 262 lines · 239 tokens per session scan A 52b65a30edc2
binlog-failure-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository ANcpLua/ancplua-claude-plugins (6 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 239 tokens to every session and 4,152 once invoked, about $0.0012 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
smoke-test
Health smoke tests + auto-fix for gbrain installs (and OpenClaw services when present). Run after machine/container restarts or whenever something seems broken. Tests critical services, auto-fixes bounded local issues, and reports worker topology without starting daemons. Extensible via user-defined test scripts in…
mcore-create-issue
Investigate a failing GitHub Actions run or job and create a GitHub issue for the failure.
debug-task
Diagnose and fix moon tasks that are broken, misconfigured, or behaving unexpectedly. Use this skill when a moon task is failing, not running, skipped, hanging, producing stale or wrong output, cached when it shouldn't be, re-running every time when it should be cached, or when outputs are empty or missing after a…
github-ci-fix
Fix failing GitHub CI / Actions checks via fixgithubprci and push to the existing PR head, or fix a branch's failing CI via a linked repair worktree.
github-ci-fix
Use when the user asks OpenSRE to fix failing GitHub CI, GitHub Actions checks, failing pull request checks, a broken PR branch, or CI on a named branch such as main.
ci-triage
Classify CI failures — distinguish clear regressions from infra flakes and security-test failures. Produces structured failure reports.