Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add andr-ca/agentharness --skill agentic-loopsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andr-ca/agentharnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/andr-ca/agentharness/agentic-loops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andr-ca/agentharness/agentic-loops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andr-ca/agentharness/agentic-loops/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andr-ca/agentharness/agentic-loops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andr-ca/agentharness/agentic-loops.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.01966 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00786 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00393 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00197 |
Grade A, and why
agentic-loops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 266 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agentic Loops: Agents, Tools, Workflows
Structured patterns for building multi-turn agents that reason, act, and observe.
An agentic loop is:
- Think: Agent reasons about task → decides action
- Act: Call tools / take action
- Observe: Get result, update state
- Repeat: Loop until task complete
Minimal Loop — use the tested implementation, don't hand-roll this
Don't write a bespoke think/act/observe loop from scratch — it's easy to
get the tool-result protocol wrong (feeding a tool's result back as a
plain "user" message loses the call binding and looks like human input
to the model, instead of {"role": "tool", "tool_call_id": ..., ...}),
easy to leave out a budget (infinite loop if the model never stops
calling tools), and easy to skip argument validation (a malformed tool
call reaches your tool function instead of being rejected).
agent_loop.py, bundled alongside this file (a symlink back to
patterns/agentic-loops/agent_loop.py, so it resolves whether you
installed the whole harness or only this one skill), is a minimal, tested
(100% coverage), provider-neutral implementation that gets these right:
JSON-Schema-validated arguments, provider-correct tool-result messages, an
iteration + wall-clock budget, an optional approval hook, and an auditable
trace that never logs raw tool output. See
patterns/agentic-loops/README.md in the full harness checkout for the
complete usage example and what it does not cover (sandboxing,
prompt-injection handling, real cost accounting, cancellation,
retries/idempotency, persistence, evals) — that guide isn't bundled with
this skill since it's documentation, not something the skill needs to
function.
# Run from this skill's own directory, or add it to sys.path — see
# test_agent_loop.py (also bundled here) for a runnable example.
from agent_loop import Budget, ToolSpec, run_agent_loop
tool = ToolSpec(name="add", fn=add, parameters_schema={...}) # JSON Schema
result = run_agent_loop(
model_fn=my_provider_adapter, # translates to/from your provider's native shape
tools={"add": tool},
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "What is 2 + 3?"}],
budget=Budget(max_iterations=5, max_seconds=30),
)
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 266 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 541b57987bcb
agentic-loops is a skill published in the GitHub repository andr-ca/agentharness (1 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,966 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
webgl-holographic-foil
A self-contained WebGL2 hero: thin-film interference over a crushed-foil surface whose palette shifts with the viewing angle; move the cursor to tilt the film.
cdf-anomalygen
Use when running the CDF AnomalyGen pipeline over a defect dataset — mask placement, fine-tuning, synthetic defect-image generation (SDG), evaluation, quality refinement, and pseudo-labeling — even when the user names only one stage.
deepstream-sop
Use this skill when building, deploying, evaluating, debugging, or measuring latency for the DeepStream SOP Inference Microservice — a GPU-accelerated FastAPI service that detects whether operators perform assembly-line steps in order via event boundary detection (GEBD) plus VLM classification. Trigger even if the…
hsb-ip-packetizer
Choose or explain HSB Sensor RX packetizer fields for HOLOLINKdef.svh. Do not use for full defs, validation, or runtime APB programming.
parabricks
Plan NVIDIA Parabricks pbrun commands, translate CPU options and check runtime readiness. Use for individual tools, including planning-only questions.
jetson-diagnostic
Read-only Jetson health snapshot for identity, memory, GPU, thermal, power, storage, services, and top processes.