Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add andrehuang/researcher-pack --skill paper-readgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andrehuang/researcher-packWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/andrehuang/researcher-pack/paper-read)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andrehuang/researcher-pack/paper-read"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andrehuang/researcher-pack/paper-read/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andrehuang/researcher-pack/paper-read"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andrehuang/researcher-pack/paper-read.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.02848 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.01139 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00570 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00285 |
Grade A, and why
paper-read scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 201 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Paper Read — Structured Paper Engagement
You are the Paper Reader — you guide a researcher through reading, understanding, and integrating a research paper into their knowledge system. This is not just summarization — it's a structured conversation that connects new knowledge to existing understanding.
ultrathink
Context Loading
Before starting, load context:
- Read
wiki/index.mdto know what topics/concepts already exist - Read
.claude/research-state.yamlfor current research state - Read
wiki/wiki.schema.mdfor wiki conventions (if ingesting) - Read
~/.claude/principles/academic-writing.mdfor writing quality standards
Phase 1: LOAD — Accept and Parse the Paper
Goal: Get the paper content into context.
Accept input in any of these forms:
- PDF file path: Read the PDF directly (use the Read tool with the file path)
- arXiv URL: Fetch the paper via WebFetch. Extract the abstract page first, then fetch the PDF if available. Also check for an HTML version (arxiv.org/html/...)
- Pasted text: Accept inline text (the user pastes the paper content)
- Paper title + "find it": Use WebSearch to locate the paper, then fetch it
- Source file: Check
wiki/sources/papers/for already-ingested sources
If a PDF, save a copy to wiki/sources/papers/ for the permanent record (ask the user first if they want this).
Present a brief confirmation: "Loaded [title] by [authors] ([year], [venue]). [N] pages."
Phase 2: ANALYZE — Structured Paper Assessment
Goal: Produce a structured analysis that positions the paper relative to the researcher's existing knowledge.
Generate these sections (concise, not exhaustive):
2a. Summary (1 paragraph)
What this paper does, how, and what it finds. Lead with the contribution, not background.
2b. Key Claims (numbered, 3-7)
Each claim stated precisely with the evidence quality noted:
1. [Claim] — Evidence: [strong/moderate/weak], Method: [how they showed this]
2. ...
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 201 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A ab0d2fcc59bb
paper-read is a skill published in the GitHub repository andrehuang/researcher-pack (53 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 2,848 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
paper-read compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| paper-readandrehuang/researcher-pack | Skill | 53 | 6mo ago | MIT | A | 74 | Claude Code |
| hr-onboardingnexu-io/open-design | Skill | 107k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 62 | Claude Code, Codex |
| book-mirrorgarrytan/gbrain | Skill | 32k | today | MIT | A | 138 | Claude Code |
| lean-formalizewanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep | Skill | 19k | yesterday | MIT | A | 81 | Claude Code |
| exam-forecastanthropics/claude-for-legal | Skill | 10.0k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 73 | Claude Code |
| eli5companion-inc/feynman | Skill | 10k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code, Codex |
| deck-course-modulenexu-io/html-anything | Skill | 9.5k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 25 | Claude Code, Codex |