Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add andreibesleaga/GABBE --skill clean-codergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andreibesleaga/GABBEWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/andreibesleaga/gabbe/clean-coder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andreibesleaga/gabbe/clean-coder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andreibesleaga/gabbe/clean-coder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andreibesleaga/gabbe/clean-coder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andreibesleaga/gabbe/clean-coder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.01034 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00517 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00207 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
clean-coder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 59 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 221a1dcd2c78
clean-coder is a skill published in the GitHub repository andreibesleaga/GABBE (22 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 1,034 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review-excellence
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.
multi-reviewer-patterns
Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions with finding deduplication, severity calibration, and consolidated reporting. Use this skill when organizing multi-reviewer code reviews, calibrating finding severity, or consolidating review results.
review-fix-signoff-loop
Use when writing Agent Relay or Ricky workflows that must loop review, fix, and validation with fresh agent context until independent signoff agents, typically Claude and Codex, both agree the work is comprehensively complete. Covers fresh-context iterations, repairable gates, dual reviewer verdict contracts…
pr-review
Review a GitHub pull request using multiple expert personas. Takes a PR URL as input, analyzes the changes, and generates comprehensive review feedback from different perspectives (Merge Specialist, Frontend, Backend, Security, DevOps, AI/Agent, SRE, Chief Architect).
github-review-pr
Review GitHub pull requests with evidence-backed, multi-perspective analysis and false-positive filtering. Use when the user asks to review, inspect, or check a GitHub pull request by number or URL. Default to reporting findings locally; publish comments, submit reviews, or approve only when the user explicitly…
prepare-pr
End-to-end drives working-tree changes to a review-ready pull request — commit, sync base, squash to one commit, open/update the PR — then KEEPS RUNNING IN-SESSION (poll CI + code-review bots in 5-min rounds, up to 10) fixing every legitimate Critical/High finding and build failure until the PR is review-ready (never…