Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add andreibesleaga/GABBE --skill cognitive-architecturesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andreibesleaga/GABBEWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/andreibesleaga/gabbe/cognitive-architectures)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andreibesleaga/gabbe/cognitive-architectures"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andreibesleaga/gabbe/cognitive-architectures/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andreibesleaga/gabbe/cognitive-architectures"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andreibesleaga/gabbe/cognitive-architectures.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00760 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00380 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00076 |
Grade C, and why
cognitive-architectures scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
- **Operator sanitization (SOAR):** before Selection, run every candidate operator through an immutable safety filter that discards destructive commands (`rm -rf`, `DROP TABLE`) regardless of heuristic score. The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 54 lines · 22 tokens per session scan C 6c8d0e847f74
cognitive-architectures is a skill published in the GitHub repository andreibesleaga/GABBE (22 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 760 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-security
Reviews AI agent architectures for security risks including permission model design, least-privilege enforcement, human-in-the-loop gate placement, blast radius containment, audit trail completeness, rollback capability, and multi-agent trust boundaries. Auto-invoked when reviewing agentic AI systems where LLMs invoke…
github-multi-repo
Multi-repository coordination, synchronization, and architecture management with AI swarm orchestration.
sparc-methodology
SPARC (Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion) comprehensive development methodology with multi-agent orchestration.
nft-standards
Implement NFT standards (ERC-721, ERC-1155) with proper metadata handling, minting strategies, and marketplace integration. Use when creating NFT contracts, building NFT marketplaces, or implementing digital asset systems.
parallel-feature-development
Coordinate parallel feature development with file ownership strategies, conflict avoidance rules, and integration patterns for multi-agent implementation. Use this skill when decomposing a large feature into independent work streams, when two or more agents need to implement different layers of the same system…
projection-patterns
Build read models and projections from event streams. Use when implementing CQRS read sides, building materialized views, or optimizing query performance in event-sourced systems.