Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add andreibesleaga/GABBE --skill tdd-cyclegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andreibesleaga/GABBEWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/andreibesleaga/gabbe/tdd-cycle)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andreibesleaga/gabbe/tdd-cycle"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andreibesleaga/gabbe/tdd-cycle/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andreibesleaga/gabbe/tdd-cycle"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andreibesleaga/gabbe/tdd-cycle.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.01373 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00549 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00275 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00137 |
Grade A, and why
tdd-cycle scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 93 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 6e54eaae0e52
tdd-cycle is a skill published in the GitHub repository andreibesleaga/GABBE (23 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 1,373 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
dd-code-generation
Use pup CLI for immediate Datadog operations or generate code for integration into applications.
python-testing
Guidelines for writing and running tests in the Agent Framework Python codebase. Use this when creating, modifying, or running tests.
fixing-flaky-tests
Guides an agent through reproducing, root-causing, fixing, and validating flaky tests in the PostHog monorepo. Use when a test fails intermittently in CI but passes on rerun or locally, when hogli ci:insights or the debugging-ci-failures skill classifies a failure as a flaky test, when given a GitHub Actions URL for a…
qa-frontend
Internal PostHog developer frontend/browser QA skill. Use only when a PostHog developer explicitly asks to run frontend QA, browser-test a PR, verify a UI flow against the local PostHog stack, use qa-frontend, or QA current frontend changes with browser/runtime evidence, or to make a feature reel (see reel mode…
writing-tests
Gates whether a new test should exist and forces it to be efficient, protecting CI from low-value test bloat. Use before any change to what a pytest, Jest, or Playwright test asserts or sets up, down to one fixture or one assertion added to an existing block. Front-loads the value bar (every test must catch a…
creating-online-evaluations
Author continuously-running online evaluations in PostHog AI observability, grounded in real failure modes you've identified. Use when the user wants evaluations that automatically score new generations or whole traces going forward — "create an eval to catch X", "continuously check that responses do Y", "turn these…