Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/andresharpe/dotbot/write-unit-testsnpx skills add andresharpe/dotbot --skill write-unit-testsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andresharpe/dotbotWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00026 | $0.01058 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00529 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00212 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
write-unit-tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 186 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Write Unit Tests
Guide for writing effective unit tests that verify behavior and catch regressions.
When to Use
- Testing pure logic and business rules
- Verifying individual components in isolation
- Testing edge cases and error conditions
- TDD red-green-refactor cycle
Test Structure (Arrange-Act-Assert)
[Fact]
public void MethodName_Scenario_ExpectedBehavior()
{
// Arrange - Set up test data and dependencies
var dependency = Substitute.For<IDependency>();
dependency.GetData().Returns(expectedData);
var sut = new SystemUnderTest(dependency);
// Act - Execute the behavior being tested
var result = sut.MethodUnderTest(input);
// Assert - Verify expected outcomes
result.Should().Be(expectedValue);
dependency.Received(1).GetData();
}
Test Naming
Use descriptive names that explain what's being tested:
MethodName_Scenario_ExpectedBehaviorMethodName_WhenCondition_ShouldDoSomethingMethodName_GivenInput_ReturnsExpectedOutput
Examples:
Calculate_WithNegativeNumber_ThrowsArgumentExceptionProcessOrder_WhenInventoryInsufficient_ReturnsFailureResultFormatDate_GivenNull_ReturnsEmptyString
Test Coverage
1. Happy Path
- Normal, expected inputs
- Successful execution
- Expected outputs
2. Edge Cases
- Boundary values (min, max, zero, empty)
- Null inputs
- Empty collections
- Special characters
3. Error Scenarios
- Invalid inputs
- Exceptions
- Validation failures
- Constraint violations
Mocking & Isolation
- Use test doubles for dependencies
- Mock external services, databases, APIs
- Keep tests fast and deterministic
- Don't mock what you don't own (value objects, DTOs)
// Good - Mock interface
var repository = Substitute.For<IRepository>();
// Bad - Don't mock concrete classes or value objects
var dto = Substitute.For<DataTransferObject>(); // ❌
Assertions
Use fluent assertions for clarity:
// Good - Fluent and readable
result.Should().Be(expected);
result.Should().BeEquivalentTo(expected);
collection.Should().HaveCount(3);
action.Should().Throw<ArgumentException>()
.WithMessage("*invalid*");
// Avoid - Less clear
Assert.Equal(expected, result);
Assert.True(result != null);
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 186 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 59fdef5ae243
write-unit-tests is a skill published in the GitHub repository andresharpe/dotbot (54 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 1,058 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
hedgehog-planning-intake
Use on any core for first-run planning intake — Phase 0 runs the vendored BMAD-METHOD planning shelf, shared by every core, and Phase 1 (mining 04-prd.md into intent records plus the Add-ons/sync-and-remote-entities decision) is full-stack-app's and pwa-app's shared procedure — identical mechanics, a different…
inbound-triage
Maintainer-only. Use when triaging inbound GitHub issues and pull requests on skyf0xx/hedgehog — "triage the issues", "check the PRs", "review inbound", "what's in the queue". Reads each item read-only, judges it for security and for whether it is real, then fixes and closes or comments and closes. Not part of the…
bmad-product-brief
Create, update, or validate a product brief. Use when the user wants help producing, editing, or validating a brief.
bmad-revendor
Maintainer-only. Use when re-vendoring vendor-skills/BMAD/ against a newer BMAD-METHOD commit — "update BMAD", "re-vendor BMAD", "bump the BMAD pin". Not part of the Hedgehog discipline a consuming project copies; this only applies to the Hedgehog repo itself.
bmad-deep-recon
Decision-grade research, three ways: draft a deep-research prompt for the user to run in their own tool (ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, …), process a finished research report — file it, distill a succinct cited summary with metadata that downstream skills consume without reprocessing — or run the research here…
conventional-commits
Use when uncommitted changes need to be split into atomic, conventional commits ordered for review. Triggers on "commit this", "make commits", "clean up commits", "commit the changes". In Hedgehog, each Loop step is already meant to be its own commit — this skill matters most when a Correction Protocol fast-forward…