Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AndreVianna/aid-methodology --skill aid-design-testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AndreVianna/aid-methodologyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/andrevianna/aid-methodology/aid-design-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andrevianna/aid-methodology/aid-design-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andrevianna/aid-methodology/aid-design-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andrevianna/aid-methodology/aid-design-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andrevianna/aid-methodology/aid-design-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00155 | $0.00985 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00077 | $0.00492 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00197 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00098 |
Grade A, and why
aid-design-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to aid-design-cli — 54 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 89 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Design Test (develop a design seed, resolve nothing)
Bind VERB=design, ARTIFACT=test -- the design stage in the contract's
vocabulary -- then follow the shared contract at
.claude/aid/templates/design-lifecycle.md. This skill binds that contract and
restates none of its rules. The seed it writes is .aid/design/test.md; realizing it into
authored tests is /aid-create-test's job, not this one's.
- Boundary vs
/aid-create-test: that skill authors the tests from a ready seed; this one only develops the seed. Neither resolves anything on its own -- the user decides when a seed is ready to realize. - Boundary vs
/aid-design-testing-strategyand/aid-test: the first designs the testing policy, not specific tests;/aid-testruns existing suites rather than designing them. - Not a numbered pipeline phase; does not route to
/aid-execute.
State machine: INTAKE -> DESIGN -> VERIFY (loop) -> PRESENT [user decides] -> DONE, as
design-lifecycle.md § Skill shape defines it. Print the [State: NAME] -- {purpose}
entry line on each state.
State: INTAKE
- Require a subject. Empty argument -> ask one bootstrapping question ("What tests do you want to design -- the units under test, the cases, and the framework?") and wait.
- Allocate through the Work Initiation Gate exactly as the contract's Allocation rule
requires (
.claude/skills/aid-design/SKILL.mdINTAKE step 4 is the shape), withinitiator: aid-design-test.phaseis not driven. - Acquire
.aid/design/per the contract, then read.aid/design/test.mdif a prior seed exists -- re-invocation iterates it rather than starting over. - Classify complexity for the
aid-architectdispatch (verifier tier >= producer).
Advance: DESIGN.
State: DESIGN
Dispatch aid-architect (clean context, tiered) to write or iterate
.aid/design/test.md in the seed shape the contract fixes (design-seed.md;
feature-002 §4), grounded in .aid/knowledge/ and the project source plus any seed read
in INTAKE. What this artifact's seed must settle: the units under test, the cases, and
the framework and fixtures; its ## Destination names where the authored tests land.
Never writes .aid/knowledge/ and never writes production code -- the design
invariant (design-lifecycle.md).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 89 lines · 155 tokens per session scan A 9b0949a920ac
aid-design-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository AndreVianna/aid-methodology (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 155 tokens to every session and 985 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to aid-design-cli, differing in 54 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.