openspec-apply-change

A workflow for implementing tasks described by an OpenSpec change. OpenSpec is a local system for storing proposed software changes, their requirements, and implementation tasks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to start or continue implementing a named change, inspect its tasks and status, validate the result, or finish and archive the change when appropriate.
Why use it?
It helps select the correct change and follow its documented instructions instead of implementing an unclear request from memory. It also supports work across multiple registered OpenSpec stores.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/andrewbartels1/solidworksmcp-python/openspec-apply-change
Any agent
npx skills add andrewbartels1/SolidworksMCP-python --skill openspec-apply-change
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andrewbartels1/SolidworksMCP-python

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 31 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,741 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 89% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00031 $0.01741
Opus 5 $0.00015 $0.00870
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00348
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00174

Measured 2d ago against content hash 5c4c0edaa6f7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

openspec-apply-change scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

89% identical to openspec-apply-change — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/skills/openspec-apply-change/SKILL.md · 186 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 186 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.

Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.

Input: Optionally specify a change name (e.g., /opsx:apply add-auth). If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.

Steps

  1. Select the change

    If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:

    • Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
    • Auto-select if only one active change exists
    • If ambiguous, run openspec list --json to get available changes and ask the user to select one

    Always announce: "Using change: " and how to override (e.g., /opsx:apply <other>).

  2. Check status to understand the schema

    openspec status --change "<name>" --json
    

    Parse the JSON to understand:

    • schemaName: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
    • planningHome, changeRoot, and actionContext: planning scope and edit constraints
    • Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)
  3. Get apply instructions

    openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --json
    

    This returns:

    • contextFiles: artifact ID -> array of concrete file paths (varies by schema - could be proposal/specs/design/tasks or spec/tests/implementation/docs)
    • Progress (total, complete, remaining)
    • Task list with status
    • Dynamic instruction based on current state
    • Optional context: current required project instruction input from the selected root
    • Optional operationGuidance: current advisory guidance for apply

    Handle states:

    • If state: "blocked" (missing artifacts): show message, suggest using /opsx:continue (if it is not installed, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json to see the next artifact and openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json for how to create it)
    • If state: "all_done": congratulate, suggest archive
    • Otherwise: proceed to implementation

    Treat context as a required prompt-level input. Read and consider it, and apply relevant project facts, conventions, and constraints while implementing. Treat operationGuidance as optional additive advice. Read and consider every entry, and follow entries that are applicable and compatible with the built-in workflow.

    Keep both fields separate from CLI-returned state, missing artifacts, tasks, progress, contextFiles, and the built-in instruction. They are not evidence of task completion, do not replace the built-in instruction, and do not permit bypassing a blocked state. If context conflicts with the built-in instruction, an explicit user choice, or a CLI-controlled value, report the conflict and preserve the controlling value. If guidance is inapplicable or conflicts with those controlling inputs, do not follow it and explain why. These are prompt-level behavior contracts, not enforceable checks.

  4. Read context files

    Read every file path listed under contextFiles from the apply instructions output. The files depend on the schema being used:

    • spec-driven: proposal, specs, design, tasks
    • Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output

Read the full file on GitHub · 186 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 186 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 5c4c0edaa6f7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

openspec-apply-change is a skill published in the GitHub repository andrewbartels1/SolidworksMCP-python (65 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,741 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to openspec-apply-change, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

agent-host-chat-contributions

Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.

microsoft/vscode · 56 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens