Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add AndrewDongminYoo/rn-agents-kit --skill rn-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AndrewDongminYoo/rn-agents-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/andrewdongminyoo/rn-agents-kit/rn-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andrewdongminyoo/rn-agents-kit/rn-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andrewdongminyoo/rn-agents-kit/rn-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andrewdongminyoo/rn-agents-kit/rn-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andrewdongminyoo/rn-agents-kit/rn-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.01208 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00604 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00242 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00121 |
Grade A, and why
rn-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 107 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
RN Code Audit
Overview
This skill reviews a React Native or Expo target for concrete code-quality defects. It separates discovery from verification so a plausible concern does not become a finding without a second reading of the relevant code. The audit does not modify source files.
When to Use
- "audit this React Native app or feature"
- "review this React Native diff before merge"
- "look for hook, rendering, list, native-boundary, or effect problems"
- "give me a code-quality report with reproducible evidence"
Prerequisites
- Identify one target: an app root, a directory, a file, or
diff. - For
diff, setBASE_REFto the pull request base ref, ormainwhen no pull request exists. - Use the repository's tracked source and configuration files as default evidence.
- When the target is a named file or feature directory, include untracked source inside that target.
- For an app-root or diff audit, list untracked source with
git ls-files --others --exclude-standard. Report untracked source as a coverage gap unless a named file or feature directory includes it. - Exclude generated and vendored paths from discovery by default. Review an intentionally maintained generated file only when the target explicitly names it.
- Use collaboration tools only when the active runtime exposes them.
Quick Steps
- Inspect the target, project layout, React Native or Expo version, and enabled architecture before selecting review lenses.
- Include untracked source when a named file or feature directory contains it.
- For an app-root or diff audit, list untracked source with
git ls-files --others --exclude-standard. Report it as a coverage gap unless a named file or feature directory includes it.
- For a
difftarget, setMERGE_BASE=$(git merge-base "$BASE_REF" HEAD). Inspectgit diff --name-status --find-renames "$BASE_REF"...HEADand the complete patch before selecting lenses.- Read a deleted preimage with
git show "$MERGE_BASE:$OLD_PATH". - Read both blobs for a renamed path with
git show "$MERGE_BASE:$OLD_PATH"andgit show "HEAD:$NEW_PATH".
- Read a deleted preimage with
- Select up to five distinct lenses that match the target, such as render cost, hook correctness, list virtualization, native boundaries, or effect cleanup.
- For each proposed finding, read the cited code and the closest relevant context.
- Have an independent reviewer challenge each finding when the runtime supports independent review.
- When independent review is unavailable, perform a separate sequential challenge pass and label the report
[PARTIAL]. - Report only verified findings with file locations, evidence, severity, and a concrete next step.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +34 lines · -48 tokens per session 6557bb4b7990
- 9d ago First seen · 73 lines · 93 tokens per session scan A 59b32f423ed5
rn-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository AndrewDongminYoo/rn-agents-kit (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 1,208 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
validate-mobile
Run a Maestro flow on an explicitly selected iOS or Android device and report behavioral evidence.
swiftui-expert
This skill should be used when the user is building, reviewing, or debugging SwiftUI views and apps. Detects iOS and Swift version from the project. Covers creating views, state management with @Observable, NavigationStack routing, animations, accessibility, performance optimization, Liquid Glass adoption, design…
audit-round
External-audit role for arcgentic rounds. Loaded when arcgentic state.yaml is in awaitingaudit or auditinprogress, OR when the user explicitly requests an external audit of a finished round, OR when reviewing a handoff doc + commit chain against the round's declared scope. Produces a PASS / NEEDSFIX / AUDITINCOMPLETE…
code-reviewer
Code review knowledge base: quality, security (OWASP Top 10), error-handling, performance, and test-coverage checklists with severity-ranked output format. Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, or before commits. Loaded automatically by the code-reviewer agent.
arrow-maintenance
Navigation and audit overlay for linked-intent development. Use when working with docs/arrows/ — orienting via index.yaml, auditing spec-to-code coherence, detecting reverse orphans and drift, splitting/merging/renaming/re-parenting segments. Dual-mode: ambient guidance when the overlay is present…
reviewer
Philosophical guardrails enforcer — independently audits code, tests, and spec for layered-integrity, Why>What, error-as-data, and the related Ironclad philosophical invariants. Activate only when the connected project contains spec.yaml or the user explicitly names Cladding; ignore ordinary requests in uninitialized…