Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add andrewvaughan/agent-council --skill submit-prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andrewvaughan/agent-councilWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/andrewvaughan/agent-council/submit-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/andrewvaughan/agent-council/submit-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/andrewvaughan/agent-council/submit-pr.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.01935 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00967 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00387 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00194 |
Grade A, and why
submit-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 216 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Submit Pull Request Workflow
Create a well-documented pull request for the current feature branch, following the project's trunk-based development workflow and PR template.
[!CAUTION] Scope boundary: This skill pushes code, creates pull requests, monitors CI, and commits CI fixes (with user approval). It does NOT implement new features or run formal code reviews. When the PR is created and CI passes, stop — the workflow is complete.
[!WARNING] Checkpoint protocol. When this workflow reaches a
### CHECKPOINT, you must actively prompt the user for a decision — do not simply present information and continue. Use your agent's interactive prompting mechanism (e.g.,AskUserQuestionin Claude Code) to require an explicit response before proceeding. This prevents queued or in-flight messages from being misinterpreted as approval. If your agent lacks interactive prompting, output the checkpoint content and stop all work until the user explicitly responds.
Step 1: Pre-Submission Checks
Verify the branch is ready for a pull request:
-
Confirm we are on a feature branch (not
main). If onmain, stop and ask the user to create a feature branch first. -
Sync with main:
git fetch origin git rebase origin/mainIf there are conflicts, stop and help the user resolve them before proceeding.
-
Run your project's quality checks:
# Adapt to your project's toolchain type-check # TypeScript tsc, mypy, etc. lint # ESLint, Ruff, golangci-lint, etc. format:check # Prettier, Black, gofmt, etc. test # Vitest, Jest, pytest, etc. build # If a build step existsIf formatting checks fail, auto-fix by running the formatter on the reported files and stage the changes.
-
Perform a final security scan on changed files:
- Are there hardcoded secrets, API keys, or credentials in the diff?
- Are all user inputs validated and sanitized?
- Are authentication and authorization checks present on new endpoints?
- Are error responses safe? (no internal details leaked)
- Are dependencies free of known CVEs?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 216 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 704dc957dade
submit-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository andrewvaughan/agent-council (13 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,935 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
aiwg-pr
AIWG-specific pull request delivery workflow for AIWG product/workspace changes; not the generic repository PR process.
artifact-metadata
Manage artifact metadata, versioning, ownership, and review history across the SDLC lifecycle.
git-mirror-audit
Verify configured secondary git mirrors are present and not drifting from the primary remote/default branch.
aiwg-delivery-pr
AIWG-specific delivery pull request workflow; explicit alias for aiwg-pr, not a generic repository PR guide.
changelog
Generate a structured changelog from git history — use when asked to create a changelog, release notes, or summarize what changed between versions/tags/branches.
release-check
Pre-release verification with structured report. Validates test coverage, security status, CHANGELOG completeness, dependency freshness, tech debt severity. Outputs GO/NO-GO recommendation with confidence score and specific remediation steps.