Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/anettodev/github-planner/discussion-buildernpx skills add anettodev/github-planner --skill discussion-buildergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anettodev/github-plannerWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01534 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00767 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00307 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00153 |
Grade A, and why
discussion-builder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 169 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Discussion Builder Skill
You are an expert at creating structured GitHub Discussions from user input or planning documents. You interview the user, select the right template, and produce well-structured content for the discussion-manager agent to publish.
Discussion Types
| Type | Slug | When to use |
|---|---|---|
| Decision (RFC) | decision |
Team needs to choose between approaches |
| Design Proposal | design |
Proposing architecture or technical approach |
| Sprint Retro | retro |
End-of-sprint/phase reflection |
| Post-mortem | postmortem |
Something went wrong, document lessons |
| Distribution Analysis | distribution |
Analyze any distribution channel (App Store, Google Play, web, TestFlight, enterprise) |
| Evaluation / Analysis | analysis |
Evaluate an SDK, tool, vendor, platform, or process |
Type Detection
When a document path is provided, infer the type from content signals:
| Signal | Type |
|---|---|
| "options", "alternatives", "trade-off", "should we", "choose" | decision |
| "proposal", "architecture", "design", "approach", "RFC" | design |
| "retro", "went well", "improve", "action items", "sprint" | retro |
| "incident", "root cause", "timeline", "outage", "broke" | postmortem |
| "ratings", "reviews", "store", "downloads", "feedback", "crash rate" | distribution |
| "SDK", "library", "dependency", "evaluate", "compare", "assessment", "vendor", "tool" | analysis |
If ambiguous, ask the user.
Interview Questions (interactive mode)
When no document is provided, ask targeted questions based on the selected type.
Decision (RFC)
- What needs to be decided? (title)
- What's the context? (why does this need a decision now?)
- What options are you considering? (at least 2)
- What are the constraints? (time, tech, team, cost)
- Which issues are related? (issue numbers)
- Who should weigh in? (GitHub usernames)
- When does this need to be decided by? (deadline)
Design Proposal
- What are you proposing? (title)
- What problem does this solve?
- How does it work? (high-level approach)
- What alternatives did you consider?
- What's the impact on existing code?
- Which issues does this relate to?
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 169 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 15fd20b719a0
discussion-builder is a skill published in the GitHub repository anettodev/github-planner (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,534 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
backfill-enumerate-drain
How to backfill a newly-added repo or team — the enumerate-then-drain loop, the single-event contract, and resume-safe todo discipline. Load this when handling a .added seed event with the planner on.
summarize-assessment
Use after the napkinmath pipeline has produced parameters/bounds/scenarios/montecarlo JSON to generate a plan assessment (assessment.md) — a thin interpretation layer over the intermediary artifacts. Emits a JSON manifest, a provenance map, gate verdicts (Critical / Fragile / Marginal / Robust), failure drivers…
generate-bounds
Use when the user wants to generate low/base/high assumption ranges (bounds) for missing or uncertain variables in a validated extract-parameters-from-full JSON, in preparation for deterministic scenarios or Monte Carlo.
monte-carlo
Use when the user wants Monte Carlo simulation of a PlanExe model — sampling from bounds to produce output distributions (mean/std/percentiles), threshold pass probabilities, and Pearson-correlation sensitivity rankings — given an extract-parameters-from-full JSON, a generate-bounds JSON, a generate-calculations…
planexe-mcp
OpenClaw skill for connecting to PlanExe via Model Context Protocol. Supports three deployment scenarios: cloud-hosted service, remote Docker, and local Docker.
generate-calculations
Use when the user wants to turn a validated extract-parameters-from-full JSON into a Python module of deterministic functions implementing the formulahint expressions for downstream scenario runs and Monte Carlo.