Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp --skill customer-support-opsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anhnguyen0905/codex-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp/customer-support-ops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp/customer-support-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp/customer-support-ops/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp/customer-support-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp/customer-support-ops.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.01361 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00681 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00272 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
customer-support-ops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 107 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Customer Support Operations (triage, SLAs, quality, staffing, deflection)
Triage: severity × impact, decided by rule not by mood
Every inbound ticket gets a priority from a written matrix — severity (broken for the customer?) × impact (how many customers / how much revenue?) — plus routing to the queue that can actually resolve it. Triage done by whoever reads it first, on vibes, means priority tracks how angry the customer sounded.
P1 service down / data loss / security — page someone, all-hands until mitigated
P2 core function broken, no workaround — same-business-day engagement
P3 degraded or has a workaround — normal queue
P4 question / feature request — normal queue, feeds the KB and product backlog
Escalation paths are named in advance: which tier owns what, what evidence must accompany a hand-off (repro steps, account, logs), and who is paged for P1. An escalation that restarts diagnosis from zero doubles resolution time.
SLA design and the metrics that matter
first response time (FRT) = ticket created → first human (not auto-ack) response
resolution time = created → resolved, clock paused while pending-customer (say so)
SLA attainment = tickets meeting target / tickets in period — per priority tier
first contact resolution = resolved with no reopen and no additional agent contact / resolved
reopen rate = reopened within N days / resolved (the lie detector for "resolved")
backlog age = distribution of open ticket ages, not just the count
Set targets per priority, from measured capability plus headroom — an SLA copied from a competitor's marketing page is a promise chosen at random. Report percentiles (e.g. 90th) rather than averages: an average FRT of 2h coexists comfortably with a tail of customers waiting three days.
Quality: CSAT, CES, NPS — and QA scorecards
- CSAT (post-resolution, per ticket) measures the interaction. Report response rate alongside — 20% response CSAT is a self-selected sample. CES (effort) predicts loyalty better for support interactions. NPS measures relationship, moves slowly, and is mostly not a support metric; don't hold agents to it.
- QA scorecard: sample tickets per agent per week, scored against written criteria (accuracy, completeness, tone, process adherence) with calibration sessions so two reviewers give the same ticket the same score. Uncalibrated QA is a popularity contest.
- Never target reopen-able metrics in isolation: pushing FRT alone produces fast useless replies; pushing handle time produces premature "resolved". Pair every speed metric with FCR/reopen and CSAT.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 107 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A 8bcc99d48a15
customer-support-ops is a skill published in the GitHub repository anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 1,361 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
next-partial-prefetching-adoption
Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…