Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp/exec-self-testingnpx skills add anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp --skill exec-self-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anhnguyen0905/codex-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp/exec-self-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp/exec-self-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp/exec-self-testing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00570 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00285 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00114 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
exec-self-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 42 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Self-Testing (embed into Codex prompts)
A senior developer proves their own work. Include this block in every codex_execute prompt:
Testing requirements (mandatory):
- Every new behavior gets a test in the same task: happy path + at least one failure/edge case
(empty input, boundary value, error propagation).
- Write the test alongside or before the implementation; use the project's existing test
framework, file layout, and naming style.
- Tests assert behavior (inputs → outputs, state changes), not implementation details.
- Use Arrange-Act-Assert structure with descriptive names ("returns empty list when no match").
- Targeted tests only: run the test file or pattern for the current task using the project's
targeted command (for example, `npx vitest run tests/<file>.test.ts`), plus the build/typecheck
once before finishing. Do NOT run the full test suite — the orchestrator's `verifyCommand` is the
single authoritative acceptance run for this task, and the full suite runs once per merged
parallel wave and once in the whole-feature review.
- While iterating: re-run only that targeted command; never run the full suite mid-task.
- Environment failure: if a test command fails with a sandbox or environment error (EMFILE, EPERM,
out-of-memory, or file-watcher limits), STOP and report the verbatim error in the final summary;
do NOT re-run the full suite hoping it passes.
- Long test commands: name every test command expected to take more than two minutes in the final
summary and explain why it was needed.
- NEVER finish with failing tests or a broken build. If a pre-existing test fails for reasons
outside this task, stop and report it instead of "fixing" the test to pass.
- Fix the implementation, not the test — unless the test itself is provably wrong, and say so.
Claude's verification duty
Trust but verify: pass the task's acceptance command as verifyCommand so the server runs it after
the Codex run settles and returns verification (exitCode, passed, outputTail) and the
payload's accepted verdict — those fields are evidence, Codex's "tests pass" is not. Claude does
NOT re-run the full suite per task; it reads accepted/verification, runs the full suite once
per merged parallel wave and once in the whole-feature review, and checks the tool result's commands
list for what Codex actually ran.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +5 lines d5334d1c5ada
- 4d ago First seen · 37 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A e3259024dcd0
exec-self-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository anhnguyen0905/codex-mcp (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 570 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…