Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add animalzinc/claude-plugins/plugin install blog-style-guide-creatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/animalzinc/claude-plugins/batch-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/animalzinc/claude-plugins/batch-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/animalzinc/claude-plugins/batch-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/animalzinc/claude-plugins/batch-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/animalzinc/claude-plugins/batch-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.00474 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00190 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00095 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
batch-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Batch review
Checks every draft in a folder, one at a time, then summarizes across them. Each draft gets its own run folder and report, exactly as a single style-check would produce.
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
- List the Markdown files directly in the folder, skipping
*_edited.md,*.bak, and anything inside a.style-checkfolder. Show the count and confirm before starting when there are more than ten; each draft launches up to eight agents. - For each draft, run the
blog-style-guide-creator:style-checkskill's steps 1 to 6 with the same brand and flags. Resolve the guide once and reuse it. Never apply fixes in a batch;--applyis ignored here. - When a draft's check stops on an error, record the draft and the error and continue with the next one.
- After the last draft, read each run's
findings/final.jsonand write<folder>/style-review-summary.md:- a table of drafts with their must, should, and suggestion counts, highest first, each linked to its
report.md; - the ten rules broken most often, with the number of drafts and findings for each;
- the drafts that stopped on an error, with the error.
- a table of drafts with their must, should, and suggestion counts, highest first, each linked to its
- Show the table and the path to the summary. A rule broken in most drafts may be one the writers do not know or one the guide states badly; say which rules those are, so the user can decide whether to run
validate-style-guide.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 22 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A c9442b4cdc4c
batch-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository animalzinc/claude-plugins (15 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 474 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-11.
batch-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| batch-reviewanimalzinc/claude-plugins | Skill | 15 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 65 | Claude Code |
| cf-style-guideteachskillofskills-ai/ContentForge-techshu | Skill | 1 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 178 | Claude Code |
| cf-briefteachskillofskills-ai/ContentForge-techshu | Skill | 1 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 169 | Claude Code |
| cf-helpteachskillofskills-ai/ContentForge-techshu | Skill | 1 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 149 | Claude Code |
| cf-publishteachskillofskills-ai/ContentForge-techshu | Skill | 1 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 168 | Claude Code |
| cf-templateteachskillofskills-ai/ContentForge-techshu | Skill | 1 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 160 | Claude Code |
| cf-variantsteachskillofskills-ai/ContentForge-techshu | Skill | 1 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 162 | Claude Code |