What is grokodex-review?

A read-only code review that sends local Git changes to a local Grok agent for analysis. Git is a system that records code changes and their history.

Use it to review uncommitted changes or a comparison with a base branch and receive findings before merging or making fixes.

It provides an independent review without changing the working files. The review focuses on defects, security, tests, edge cases, and maintainability.

grokodex-review — Skill for Claude Code by anlostsheep

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent

npx skills add anlostsheep/grokodex --skill grokodex-review

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anlostsheep/grokodex

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install grokodex, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 6 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anlostsheep/grokodex/grokodex-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anlostsheep/grokodex/grokodex-review)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anlostsheep/grokodex/grokodex-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anlostsheep/grokodex/grokodex-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anlostsheep/grokodex/grokodex-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anlostsheep/grokodex/grokodex-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 79 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.

When invoked 521 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00079	$0.00521
Opus 5	$0.00039	$0.00260
Sonnet 5	$0.00016	$0.00104
Haiku 4.5	$0.00008	$0.00052

Measured 11d ago against content hash 03e96724adef, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

grokodex-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/grokodex/skills/grokodex-review/SKILL.md · 51 lines

What it actually says

Grokodex Review

Read-only code review through Grokodex MCP. Does not modify the repo.

When to use

User asks to review changes, PR, working tree, or "审一下"
Findings / risks only — no implementation
Not for design-challenge-only → grokodex-critique
Not for apply fixes → grokodex-run

Tool preference

Always call MCP grok_run with profile: "review" (required).
Forbidden: shell/grok for the review task.
Do not call grok_run without profile for a pure review request.

Steps

Determine scope: working tree (default) or user-specified base ref.
Collect with host tools: git status, staged/unstaged diff, or git diff base...HEAD. For large diffs, summarize and include the most critical file hunks.
If there is nothing to review, tell the user and stop (do not call MCP).
Build prompt including: scope label, collected diff/context, review axes (correctness, security, tests, edge cases, maintainability).
Call:

grok_run
  prompt: <assembled>
  profile: review
  # optional: cwd, model, host_thread_id, max_turns, timeout_ms

Present text findings. Do not start editing in the same turn unless the user explicitly asks to fix — then switch to grokodex-run without profile.

Permissions

profile=review forces read-only in the bridge. Do not try to pass danger-full-access to "review harder".
If envelope permission.notes mention downgrade, you may mention review stayed read-only.

Hard rules

profile=review required.
MCP only — no shell grok.
No auto-fix after review.
Host/skill collects git; bridge does not.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

11d ago First seen · 51 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A 03e96724adef

Subscribe to this mod's changes

grokodex-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository anlostsheep/grokodex (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 521 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Claude Code Code review agent codex grok mcp plugin

ai-slop-cleaner

Use when a working code path feels bloated, noisy, or over-abstracted, when asked to clean up or deslop AI-generated code, or when a reviewer-only anti-slop pass is requested.

yeaight7/agent-powerups · 48 tokens

tri-model-review

Use when a request needs parallel external perspectives — combined backend and UI work, code review from multiple angles, or cross-validation where different models may disagree.

yeaight7/agent-powerups · 34 tokens

architecture-simplification

Use when a codebase carries over-engineered abstractions, unnecessary layers, or redundant logic that should be collapsed without changing behavior.

yeaight7/agent-powerups · 31 tokens

redteam-code-audit-detail-pack

Domain routing and boundary guidance for authorized source code security review, including dangerous function tracing, data-flow analysis, logic flaw detection, and dependency review. Use when a task belongs to the code audit domain and needs scope, evidence, pivot, or exit criteria.

Unclecheng-li/DeepSec · 59 tokens

open-code-review

Performs AI-powered code review on Git changes using the ocr CLI from alibaba/open-code-review. Use when the user asks to review code, review a pull request, review staged/unstaged changes, review a commit, or compare branches for code quality issues. Produces line-level review comments and can automatically apply…

alibaba/open-code-review · 98 tokens

continual-learning

Nightly refinement of an existing per-repo review-style prompt using this reviewer's own finding outcomes. Read confirmed (resolved-by-commit / thumbs-up) and dismissed (thumbs-down) findings, promote the bug patterns the team actually fixes, demote the false-positive patterns, reconcile against the current prompt…

langchain-ai/open-swe · 89 tokens