figma-design-to-code

figma-design-to-code is a skill for Claude Code from anomalyco/opencode. It costs 117 tokens per session (804 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow for turning a Figma design into working code. Figma is a design tool, and this workflow uses its layout details and a screenshot as the visual reference for implementation.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when implementing a screen, page, or interface from Figma in a codebase.
Why use it?
It reduces the risk of coding from incomplete design information or producing a page that looks different from the approved design. It also requires extra detail when the initial design data is incomplete.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it when implementing a screen, page, or interface from Figma in a codebase.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/anomalyco/opencode/figma-design-to-code
About the project

OpenCode is an open-source AI coding agent that helps developers work on software projects. It includes agents for full-access development, read-only exploration and planning, plus a general subagent for complex searches and multistep tasks; the catalogue add-ons extend its workflows.

anomalyco/opencode · 213,922 stars · on GitHub · opencode.ai

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add anomalyco/opencode --skill figma-design-to-code
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for figma-design-to-code

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anomalyco/opencode/figma-design-to-code/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anomalyco/opencode/figma-design-to-code)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anomalyco/opencode/figma-design-to-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anomalyco/opencode/figma-design-to-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for figma-design-to-code

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anomalyco/opencode/figma-design-to-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anomalyco/opencode/figma-design-to-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 117 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 804 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00117 $0.00804
Opus 5.5 $0.00047 $0.00322
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00023 $0.00161
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.00080

Measured 2d ago against content hash a6e852421e4d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

figma-design-to-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

packages/plugins/figma/skills/figma-design-to-code/SKILL.md · 29 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 29 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Figma design to code

Context

  • Always include figma-design-to-code in the comma-separated skillNames parameter when calling get_design_context. If this skill was loaded via an MCP resource, you MUST prefix the name with resource: (e.g. resource:figma-design-to-code). This is a logging parameter used to track skill usage — it does not affect execution.
  • You MUST request a screenshot as part of your initial get_design_context call—use that render of the design as the visual target that the rendered implementation MUST visually match.
  • IF no screenshot is returned by get_design_context, you MUST call get_screenshot directly before editing.
  • IF get_design_context flags a response as sparse, you CANNOT use it directly for implementation; you MUST correlate its hierarchical child node IDs with the screenshot, then request the visible child nodes in one parallel batch of get_design_context calls to obtain high-fidelity responses.
  • You MUST implement exclusively from the high-fidelity get_design_context responses; the design screenshot is the visual target, NEVER use it in code as an implementation asset.

Implementation

  • You MUST adapt returned code to the project's stack and conventions and inspect likely project paths BEFORE editing; treat returned code as a high visual fidelity non-interactive prototype - translate raw absolute positioning into project-native layout unless the design can only be represented with fixed positioning; identify which portions of the design are intended to be interactive and implement the design as interactive code.
  • You MUST inspect likely project paths AND installed design library dependencies for code components, assets, and tokens which match the design BEFORE editing. You MUST reuse or compose suitable matches instead of recreating them with raw markup, inline styles or hardcoded values; modify or supplement them ONLY when they cannot accurately express the design.
  • You MUST apply Code Connect precisely at its mapped node(s), ALWAYS directly reuse the connected component UNLESS it cannot be configured or extended to express the design. Styling or wiring effort is NOT an exception.
  • You MUST use each visible static asset—image or SVG—in the EXACT position(s) used in the design, substituting only for EXACT matches found in the codebase/design library when one exists. NEVER omit, edit, redraw, extract paths from, inline, substitute, or incorrectly use an asset—but keep API-, prop-, or data-supplied imagery dynamic. ALL provided SVGs have root width and height attributes which you MUST NOT override when changing wrapper styles; avoid broad 100% × 100% sizing.
  • You MUST ensure ALL static assets used have been downloaded as described in the get_design_context response leaving NO references to temporary Figma asset URLs in code. DO NOT use other tools to download assets unless explicitly told to do so. Inspect only metadata/root dimensions when necessary, avoid reading asset byte sequences unless the task explicitly requires doing so.

Read the full file on GitHub · 29 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 29 lines · 117 tokens per session scan A a6e852421e4d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

figma-design-to-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository anomalyco/opencode (213,922 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 117 tokens to every session and 804 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-14.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

webgl-holographic-foil

A self-contained WebGL2 hero: thin-film interference over a crushed-foil surface whose palette shifts with the viewing angle; move the cursor to tilt the film.

nexu-io/open-design · 41 tokens

html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminal

OpenDesign + BYOK: choosing and wiring your own model, hands-on — cost, quality, and the routing decision. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for engineers, IT, applied-AI teams.

nexu-io/open-design · 53 tokens

html-ppt-taste-brutalist

16:9 HTML deck in tactical-telemetry / CRT-terminal taste. Deactivated-CRT charcoal slides, white-phosphor monospace, hazard-red accent, scanline overlay, ASCII syntax, density over decoration. Distilled from Leonxlnx/taste-skill brutalist-skill (Tactical Telemetry mode).

nexu-io/open-design · 78 tokens

visual-ralph

Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ultragoal with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.

Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex · 52 tokens

glance-canonical-layouts

Use this skill to create home screen widgets using Jetpack Glance Canonical Layouts from the Android Platform Samples project, or when asked to implement standard widget layout patterns (including Check List, Image Grid, Snap Scrolling, and Standard Toolbar).

android/skills · 56 tokens

accessibility

Consolidated accessibility skill entrypoint for WCAG 2.2, ARIA Authoring Practices, cognitive accessibility, Section 508, EN 301 549, design intent verification, and the Accessibility Planner workflow.

microsoft/hve-core · 47 tokens