Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add anotherben/claude-harness --skill helpdesk-quality-gatesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anotherben/claude-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anotherben/claude-harness/helpdesk-quality-gates)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anotherben/claude-harness/helpdesk-quality-gates"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anotherben/claude-harness/helpdesk-quality-gates/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anotherben/claude-harness/helpdesk-quality-gates"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anotherben/claude-harness/helpdesk-quality-gates.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.01760 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00704 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00352 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00176 |
Grade A, and why
helpdesk-quality-gates scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 195 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 01195b98b153
helpdesk-quality-gates is a skill published in the GitHub repository anotherben/claude-harness (7 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 1,760 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
general-best-practices
General software development best practices covering code quality, testing, security, performance, and maintainability across technology stacks.
test-audit
Audit test suites for T1-T4 violations using AST analysis, mock detection, and multi-stage synthesis. Invoke when user asks to audit tests, check test quality, find mock violations, review test effectiveness, or inspect test suites for over-mocking. Triggers automatic rewrites when quality gates fail.
ca-refactor
Restructure code without changing observable behavior: rename, extract, inline, move, deduplicate, or replace an internal implementation with an equivalent one. Prove parity through unchanged pre-existing tests. Not for new behavior, bug fixes, explanation-only questions, or committing finished work.
test-quality-review
Use as a REVIEW LENS when judging whether another agent's tests actually prove the acceptance criteria — an AC with no test, tests that assert nothing or only on mocks, mirror the implementation, mock the thing under test, never reach the concurrency or failure path the AC names, depend on order or time, or were…
confidence-based-strictness
Use when the complexity or unfamiliarity of a task should increase guardrail enforcement. Scales verification depth based on how confident the system is in the correctness of the generated code.
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.