Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add anotherben/claude-harness --skill prove-itgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anotherben/claude-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/anotherben/claude-harness/prove-it)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anotherben/claude-harness/prove-it"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anotherben/claude-harness/prove-it/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/anotherben/claude-harness/prove-it"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/anotherben/claude-harness/prove-it.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.03194 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.01597 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00639 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00319 |
Grade A, and why
prove-it scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 268 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 4323cb1bd405
prove-it is a skill published in the GitHub repository anotherben/claude-harness (7 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 3,194 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
qa
Systematic QA testing of a web application: diff-aware, tiered, with fix-and-verify loop.
test-runner
Use this skill when orchestrating agentic end-to-end tests. Resolves target + profile, dispatches the right driver(s) (playwright for web today, peekaboo for macOS (issue #381)), invokes the ux-evaluator agent (opus, read-only) against driver artifacts, reconciles findings with the open issue tracker via…
fix-bug
Run the Fix Validation pipeline to investigate, fix, and validate a bug. Ensures deterministic pipeline execution with IssueAnalyzer, FixWriter, TestWriter (conditional), TestAudit (conditional), and FixValidator stages.
debug
Investigate-then-decide root-cause analysis for a defect whose cause is unknown (distinct from /fix, which assumes a known bug). Five gated phases: capture, hypothesize, gather, decide, hand off. Investigation only, no code changes; exits to /fix, /adr, or a no-action close.
ca-fix
Fix a confirmed bug: a failing regression test first, then a minimal fix, then the rest of the tdd gates.
systematic-debugging
4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.